American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 170, Issue 6 , Pages 1705-1712, June 1994

Determination of fetal acidemia at birth from a remote umbilical arterial blood gas analysis☆☆★★

Annual Central Prize Award, presented at the Sixty-first Annual Meeting of The Central Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, White Sulphur Springs, West Virginia, October 28-30, 1993.

Jackson, Mississippi

Abstract 

OBJECTIVE: Sampling of the umbilical artery for determination of acid-base status is performed within 60 minutes of birth, but this is not feasible in all hospitals on a 24-hour basis. A desirable alternative would be to perform the arterial cord blood gas analysis hours after the sample was obtained at delivery with reliable identification of whether the newborn was acidotic. STUDY DESIGN: After 19 deliveries multiple umbilical arterial blood samples were withdrawn into five preheparinized syringes, and these were analyzed at 0.5, 15, 30, 45, and 60 hours after delivery. On the basis of observed changes in pH and base deficit over 60 hours, two separate regression equations were generated. These two equations permit calculation of the original pH and base deficit if the following are known: (1) the time interval from delivery to blood gas analysis and (2) the values of the remote pH and remote base deficit. The regression models were validated among 23 subsequent deliveries to assess how accurately they identified newborn acid-base status at birth. RESULTS: The original pH and base deficit can be calculated with two separate equations from linear regression models if two variables are known: the results of the remote umbilical arterial blood gas analysis and time interval from delivery to analysis. Of 23 newborns during the validation phase of the study, 16 were not acidotic, one had respiratory acidosis, and six had metabolic acidosis. The second umbilical arterial blood gas analysis was performed at a mean (± SD) interval of 53.8 ± 41.5 hours (range 7.5 to 138 hours). The remote gas analysis inaccurately identified 68.7% (11/16) of nonacidotic newborns as being acidotic at birth. However, insertion of these data into these equations produced results with none of the newborns predicted to have normal acid-base when they were acidotic at birth or predicted to be acidotic when the cord pH was normal. CONCLUSIONS: Use of these mathematic models allows the clinician to perform an umbilical arterial blood pH analysis ≤60 hours after delivery yet with accurate estimation of true acid-base status at birth. (AM J Obstet Gynecol 1994;170:1705-12.)

Keywords:  Mathematic models, fetal acidemia, neonatal asphyxia

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecologya and the Division of Biostatistics, Department of Preventive Medicine,b University of Mississippi Medical Center.

☆☆ Supported in part by the Vicksburg Hospital Medical Foundation.

 Reprint requests: Suneet P. Chauhan, MD, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria, One Illini Dr., Box 1649, Peoria, IL 61656.

★★ 0002-9378/94 $3.00 + 0 6/6/55187

PII: S0002-9378(94)70345-0

doi:10.1016/S0002-9378(94)70345-0

American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 170, Issue 6 , Pages 1705-1712, June 1994