American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 205, Issue 1 , Pages 30.e1-30.e7 , July 2011

Attitudes of women in their forties toward the 2009 USPSTF mammogram guidelines: a randomized trial on the effects of media exposure

Presented as a poster at the 59th Annual Clinical Meeting of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, April 30-May 4, 2011, Washington, DC.

  • AuTumn S. Davidson, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprints: AuTumn Davidson, MD, PGy3, University of Massachusetts Memorial Hospital, Obstetrics-Gynecology Resident, 119 Belmont St., Worcester, Massachusetts 01605
  • ,
  • Xun Liao, MS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA
  • ,
  • B. Dale Magee, MD, MS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA
    • Division of Public Health, Worcester, MA

Received 7 January 2011 ,Revised 22 March 2011 ,Accepted 5 April 2011.

References 

  1. Altekruse SF, Kosary CL, Krapcho M, et al. SEER cancer statistics review, 1975-2007. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2010;
  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Screening for breast cancer (Guide to clinical preventive services: an assessment of 169 interventions [CDC Report]). http://wonder.cdc.gov/wonder/prevguid/p0000109/p0000109.asp#head011000000000000Oct. 1, 1989;Accessed Feb. 27, 2011
  3. Cokkinides V, Bandi P, Siegel R, Ward EM, Thun MJ. Cancer prevention and early detection facts and figures 2008. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 2007;
  4. Screening for breast cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:716–726W-236
  5. Moss SM, Cuckle H, Evans A, Johns L, Waller M, Bobrow L. Effect of mammographic screening from age 40 years on breast cancer mortality at 10 years' follow-up: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2006;368:2053–2060
  6. Nelson HD, Tyne K, Naik A, Bougatsos C, Chan BK, Humphrey L. Screening for breast cancer: an update for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:727–737W237-42
  7. Woolf SH. The 2009 breast cancer screening recommendations of the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA. 2010;303:162–163
  8. Lexis Nexis Academic. 2010.
  9. Wilensky GR. The mammography guidelines and evidence-based medicine. health affairs blog: Health Aff. 2010;
  10. Goodman E. A backlash of mistrust. Washington Post (Nov. 25, 2009).
  11. Vennochi J. Taking a hit on health care? Why that's women's work. Boston Globe (Nov. 19, 2009, Section A17).
  12. Apicella C, Peacock SJ, Andrews L, Tucker K, Daly MB, Hopper JL. Measuring, and identifying predictors of women's perceptions of three types of breast cancer risk: population risk, absolute risk and comparative risk. Br J Cancer. 2009;100:583–589
  13. Carman KL, Maurer M, Yegian JM, et al. Evidence that consumers are skeptical about evidence-based health care. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29:1400–1406
  14. Silverman E, Woloshin S, Schwartz LM, Byram SJ, Welch HG, Fischhoff B. Women's views on breast cancer risk and screening mammography: a qualitative interview study. Med Decis Making. 2001;21:231–240
  15. Ioannidis JP. Contradicted and initially stronger effects in highly cited clinical research. JAMA. 2005;294:218–228
  16. Quality insights: clinical quality in primary care: Massachusetts statewide rates and national benchmarks. Massachusetts Health Quality Partners. 2010;

 Cite this article as: Davidson AS, Liao X, Magee BD. Attitudes of women in their forties toward the 2009 USPSTF mammogram guidelines: a randomized trial on the effects of media exposure. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;205:30.e1-7.

PII: S0002-9378(11)00451-0

doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.04.005

American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 205, Issue 1 , Pages 30.e1-30.e7 , July 2011