« Previous
Next »
American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 203, Issue 3
, Pages 190-191
, September 2010
Using birth certificate data to determine medically indicated induction rates
References
- Births: final data for 2006; national vital statistics reports: vol. 57, no. 7. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2009;
- . Are preterm births on the decline in the United States? Recent data from the National Vital Statistics System: NCHS data brief, no. 39. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2010;
- Neonatal outcome associated with singleton birth at 34-41 weeks of gestation. Int J Epidemiol. 2010;39:769–776
- . ACOG practice bulletin no. 107: induction of labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114:386–397
- . Rates of labor induction without medical indication are overestimated when derived from birth certificate data. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203:269.e1–269.e3
- The reporting of pre-existing medical conditions and complications of pregnancy on birth certificates and in hospital discharge data. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193:125–134
- . Cesarean delivery among women with low-risk pregnancies: a comparison of birth certificates and hospital discharge data. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113:33–40
- . Historical development. In: Teutsch SM, Churchill RE editor. Principles and practice of public health surveillance. 2nd ed.. New York: Oxford Press; 2000;
- . A statewide initiative to reduce inappropriate scheduled births at 360/7-386/7 weeks gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202:243.e1–243.e8
The findings and conclusions in this editorial are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
PII: S0002-9378(10)00859-8
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.07.003
« Previous
Next »
American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 203, Issue 3
, Pages 190-191
, September 2010
