« Previous
Next »
American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 203, Issue 4
, Pages
366.e1-366.e6
, October 2010
Plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in early-onset severe preeclampsia
-
Maternal plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D in early-onset severe preeclampsia (EOSPE) vs control subjects
Patients with early-onset severe preeclampsia had significantly decreased levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin
Maternal plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D in early-onset severe preeclampsia (EOSPE) vs control subjects
Patients with early-onset severe preeclampsia had significantly decreased levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D relative to healthy control pregnancies that were matched for gestational age at plasma sampling (median 25-hydroxyvitamin D, 18 vs 32 ng/mL; P < .001). The probability value was determined by Mann Whitney U test.
Robinson. Plasma 25-OH-vitamin D levels in early-onset severe preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010.
-
Plasma 25-OH-D by race and early-onset severe preeclampsia (EOSPE) statusAfrican American and white women with early-onset severe preeclampsia were noted to have decreased plasma levels of 25-hydroxyvPlasma 25-OH-D by race and early-onset severe preeclampsia (EOSPE) status
African American and white women with early-onset severe preeclampsia were noted to have decreased plasma levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OH-D) relative to matched-race, control pregnancies. African American women were noted to have the lowest plasma 25-OH-D levels when compared with white women. The bars represent mean 25-OH-D levels (mean ± SEM). The probability values were determined with the Tukey-Kramer test.
Robinson. Plasma 25-OH-vitamin D levels in early-onset severe preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010.
Reprints not available from the authors.
Supported by a Clinical and Translational Science K12 Award, Medical University of South Carolina.
Cite this article as: Robinson CJ, Alanis MC, Wagner CL, et al. Plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in early-onset severe preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;203:366.e1-6.
PII: S0002-9378(10)00811-2
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.06.036
© 2010 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 203, Issue 4
, Pages
366.e1-366.e6
, October 2010
