Volume 202, Issue 6 , Pages 584.e1-584.e12, June 2010
Differences in continence system between community-dwelling black and white women with and without urinary incontinence in the EPI study
Objective
We sought to compare continence system function of black and white women in a population-based sample.
Study Design
As part of a cross-sectional population-based study, black and white women ages 35-64 years were invited to have pelvic floor testing to achieve prespecified groups of women with and without urinary incontinence. We analyzed data collected from 335 women classified as continent (n = 137) and stress (n = 102) and urge (n = 96) incontinent based on full bladder stress test and symptoms. Continence system functions were compared across racial and continence groups.
Results
Comparing black to white women, maximal urethral closure pressure (MUCP) was 22% higher in blacks than whites (68.0 vs 55.8 cm H2O, P < .0001). White and black women with stress incontinence had MUCP 19% and 23% lower than continent women. MUCP in urge incontinent white women was as low as stress incontinent whites, but blacks with urge had normal urethral function.
Conclusion
Black women have higher urethral closure pressures than white women. White women with urge incontinence, but not black women, have reduced MUCP.
Key words: epidemiology, prevalence, racial differences, urethral axis, urethral closure pressure, urinary incontinence
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Reprints not available from the authors.
Supported by National Institute of Childhood Diseases and National Institute on Aging R01HD/AG41123. Additional investigator support was provided by Office for Research on Women's Health's Special Center of Research on Sex and Gender Factors Affecting Women's Health and the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development through Grant P50 HD044406.
Cite this article as: DeLancey JOL, Fenner DE, Guire K, et al. Differences in continence system between community-dwelling black and white women with and without urinary incontinence in the EPI study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;202:584.e1-12.
PII: S0002-9378(10)00457-6
doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2010.04.027
© 2010 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 202, Issue 6 , Pages 584.e1-584.e12, June 2010
