American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 203, Issue 2 , Pages 124.e1-124.e7 , August 2010

Decreased term and postterm birthweight in the United States: impact of labor induction

Presented at the 21st Annual Meeting of the Society for Pediatric and Perinatal Epidemiologic Research, Chicago, IL, June 23-24, 2008.

  • Xun Zhang, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatrics, McGill University Faculty of Medicine, Montreal, Quebec
    • ,
  • K.S. Joseph, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and the School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia and British Columbia's Women's Hospital and Health Center, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
    • ,
  • Michael S. Kramer, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatrics, McGill University Faculty of Medicine, Montreal, Quebec
    • Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University Faculty of Medicine, Montreal, Quebec

References 

  1. McCormick MC. The contribution of low birth weight to infant mortality and childhood morbidity. N Engl J Med. 1985;312:82–90
  2. World Health Organization. Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthropometry; WHO technical report series 854. Geneva: WHO; 1995;
  3. Goldenberg RL, Culhane JF. Low birth weight in the United States. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;85(Suppl):584–590S
  4. Simhan HN, Caritis SN. Prevention of preterm delivery. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:477–487
  5. McIntire DD, Bloom SL, Casey BM, Leveno KJ. Birth weight in relation to morbidity and mortality among newborn infants. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:1234–1238
  6. Joseph KS, Fahey TJ, Platt RW, et al. An outcome-based approach for the creation of fetal growth standards: do singletons and twins need separate standards?. Am J Epidemiol. 2009;169:616–624
  7. Barker DJP. The developmental origins of chronic adult disease. Acta Paediatr Suppl. 2004;446:26–33
  8. Arbuckle TE, Sherman GJ. An analysis of birth weight by gestational age in Canada. Can Med Assoc J. 1989;140:157–165
  9. Institute of Medicine. Nutrition during pregnancy. In: Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1990;p. 52–56
  10. Alberman E. Are our babies becoming bigger?. J R Soc Med. 1991;84:257–260
  11. Power C. National trends in birth weight: implications for future adult disease. BMJ. 1994;308:1270–1271
  12. Skjaerven R, Gjessing HK, Bakketeig LS. Birthweight by gestational age in Norway. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2000;79:440–449
  13. Joseph KS, Kramer MS, Marcoux S, et al. Determinants of preterm birth rates in Canada from 1981 through 1983 and from 1992 through 1994. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:1434–1439
  14. Demissie K, Rhoads GG, Ananth CV, et al. Trends in preterm birth and neonatal mortality among blacks and whites in the United States from 1989 to 1997. Am J Epidemiol. 2001;154:307–315
  15. Ananth CV, Joseph KS, Oyelese Y, Demissie K, Vintzileos AM. Trends in preterm birth and perinatal mortality among singletons: United States, 1989 through 2000. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105:1084–1091
  16. Kramer MS, Morin I, Yang H, et al. Why are babies getting bigger? (Temporal trends in fetal growth and its determinants). J Pediatr. 2002;141:538–542
  17. Wen SW, Kramer MS, Platt R, et al. Secular trends of fetal growth in Canada, 1981 to 1997. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2003;17:347–354
  18. Chauhan SP, Grobman WA, Gherman RA, et al. Suspicion and treatment of the macrosomic fetus: a review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193:332–346
  19. Zhang J, Yancey MK, Henderson CE. US national trends in labor induction, 1989–1998. J Reprod Med. 2002;47:120–124
  20. MacDorman MF, Mathews TJ, Martin JA, Malloy MH. Trends and characteristics of induced labor in the United States, 1989–98. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2002;16:263–273
  21. Russell SK. Trends in labor induction in the United States: is it true that what goes up must come down?. Birth. 2004;31:148–151
  22. Wing DA. Elective induction of labor in the USA. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2000;12:457–462
  23. Rayburn WF, Zhang J. Rising rates of labor induction: present concerns and future strategies. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;100:164–167
  24. Grobman WA. Elective induction: When? Ever?. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2007;50:537–546
  25. Høgberg U, Larsson N. Early dating by ultrasound and perinatal outcome: a cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1997;76:907–912
  26. Alio AP, Richman AR, Clayton HB, Jeffers DF, Wathington DJ, Salihu HM. An ecological approach to understanding black-white disparities in perinatal mortality. Matern Child Health J. 2009 Jun 27;[Epub ahead of press] (10.1007/s20995-009-0495-9)
  27. Klebanoff MA. Gestational age: not always what it seems. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:798–799
  28. Kramer MS, McLean FH, Boyd ME, Usher RH. The validity of gestational age estimation by menstrual dating in term, preterm, and postterm gestations. JAMA. 1988;260:3306–3308
  29. Martin JA. United States vital statistics and the measurement of gestational age. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2007;21:13–21
  30. Ananth CV. Menstrual versus clinical estimate of gestational age dating in the United States: temporal trends and variability in indices of perinatal outcomes. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2007;21:22–30
  31. Vital statistics of the United States: 2003 natality. Hyattsville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics; 2005;
  32. Joseph KS, Huang L, Liu S, et al. Reconciling the high rates of preterm and postterm birth in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:813–822
  33. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG practice bulletin no. 22, Fetal macrosomia. Washington, DC: ACOG; 2000;
  34. Zhang X, Decker A, Platt R, Kramer M. How big is too big? (The perinatal consequences of fetal macrosomia). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198:517.e1–517.e6
  35. Wen SW, Kramer MS. Use of ecologic studies in the assessment of intended treatment effects. J Clin Epidemiol. 1999;52:7–12
  36. Cleave N, Brown JP, Payne CD. Evaluation of methods for ecological reference. J R Statist Soc A. 1995;158:55–72
  37. Davidoff MJ, Dias T, Damus K, et al. Changes in the gestational age distribution among US singleton births: impact on rates of late preterm birth, 1992 to 2002. Semin Perinatol. 2006;30:8–15
  38. Gherman RB, Chauhan S, Ouzounian JG, Lerner H, Gonik B, Goodwin TM. Shoulder dystocia: the unpreventable obstetric emergency with empiric management guidelines. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195:657–672
  39. Bettegowda VR, Dias T, Davidoff MJ, Damus K, Callaghan WM, Petrini JR. The relationship between cesarean delivery and gestational age among US singleton births. Clin Perinatol. 2008;35:309–323
  40. Sanchez-Ramos L, Olivier F, Delke I, Kaunitz AM. Labor induction versus expectant management for postterm pregnancies: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;101:1312–1318
  41. Gulmezoglu AM, Crowther CA, Middleton P. Induction of labor for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;4:CD004945
  42. Wennerholm UB, Hagberg H, Brorsson B, Bergh C. Induction of labor versus expectant management for post-date pregnancy: is there sufficient evidence for a change in clinical practice?. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88:6–17
  43. Caughey AB, Musci TJ. Complications of term pregnancies beyond 37 weeks of gestation. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103:57–62
  44. Caughey AB, Stotland NE, Washington AE, Escobar GJ. Maternal and obstetric complications of pregnancy are associated with increasing gestational age at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196:155.e1–155.e6
  45. Smith GCS, Pell JP, Dobbie R. Risk of sudden infant death syndrome and week of gestation of term birth. Pediatrics. 2003;111:1367–1371
  46. Zhang X, Kramer M. Variations in mortality and morbidity by gestational age among infants born at term. J Pediatr. 2009;154:358–362

 Supported in part by a grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

 Reprints not available from the authors.

 Cite this article as: Zhang X, Joseph KS, Kramer MS. Decreased term and postterm birthweight in the United States: impact of labor induction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;203:124.e1-7.

PII: S0002-9378(10)00363-7

doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.03.044

American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 203, Issue 2 , Pages 124.e1-124.e7 , August 2010

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution