American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 203, Issue 2 , Pages 122.e1-122.e6, August 2010

Inadequate prenatal care and risk of preterm delivery among adolescents: a retrospective study over 10 years

Presented at the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists District VIII Annual Meeting, Los Cabos, Mexico, Sept. 25, 2008

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA

Received 3 September 2009; received in revised form 29 December 2009; accepted 1 March 2010. published online 17 May 2010.

Objective

The aim of this study was to determine whether inadequate prenatal care is associated with increased risk of preterm birth among adolescents.

Study Design

We selected a random sample of women under age 20 years with singleton pregnancies delivering in Washington State between 1995 and 2006. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess the association between prenatal care adequacy (percent of expected visits attended, adjusted for gestational age) and preterm birth.

Results

Of 30,000 subjects, 27,107 (90%) had complete data. Women without prenatal care had more than 7-fold higher risk of preterm birth (n = 84 [24.1%]; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 7.4), compared with those attending 75-100% of recommended visits (n = 346 [3.9%]). Women with less than 25%, 25-49%, or 50-74% of expected prenatal visits were at significantly increased risk of preterm birth; risk decreased linearly as prenatal care increased (n = 60 [9.5%], 132 (5.9%], 288 [5%]; and aOR, 2.5, 1.5, and 1.3, respectively).

Conclusion

Inadequate prenatal care is strongly associated with preterm birth among adolescents.

Key words: adolescent, prenatal care, preterm birth, teen pregnancy

 

 C.M.M. is supported by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Women's Reproductive Health Research Award.

 Cite this article as: Debiec KE, Paul KJ, Mitchell CM, et al. Inadequate prenatal care and risk of preterm delivery among adolescents: a retrospective study over 10 years. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;203:122.e1-6.

 Reprints not available from the authors.

PII: S0002-9378(10)00288-7

doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2010.03.001

American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 203, Issue 2 , Pages 122.e1-122.e6, August 2010