« Previous
Next »
American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 202, Issue 5
, Pages 507.e1-507.e4
, May 2010
Risk of unanticipated abnormal gynecologic pathology at the time of hysterectomy for uterovaginal prolapse
References
- Risk factors for failure of transvaginal sacrospinous uterine suspension in the treatment of uterovaginal prolapse. J Formos Med Assoc. 2005;104:249–253
- . Functional outcome after sacrospinous hysteropexy for uterine descensus. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008;19:747–752
- . Laparoscopic sacral suture hysteropexy for uterine prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006;17:378–381
- . Laparoscopic suture hysteropexy for uterine prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;97:1010–1014
- . Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament uterine suspension compared with vaginal hysterectomy with vaginal vault suspension for uterovaginal prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006;17:79–83
- . Laparoscopic uterosacral uterine suspension: a minimally invasive technique for treating pelvic organ prolapse. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2006;13:472–475
- . Cost-effectiveness analysis of annual screening strategies for endometrial cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200:640.e1–640.e8
- . Incidental pathology at vaginal hysterectomy for genital prolapse. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1970;77:1137–1139
Reprints not available from the authors.
Cite this article as: Frick A, Walters MD, Larkin KS, et al. Risk of unanticipated abnormal gynecologic pathology at the time of hysterectomy for uterovaginal prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;202:507.e1-4.
PII: S0002-9378(10)00107-9
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.01.077
© 2010 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 202, Issue 5
, Pages 507.e1-507.e4
, May 2010
