American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 202, Issue 5 , Pages 497.e1-497.e6, May 2010

Structural position of the posterior vagina and pelvic floor in women with and without posterior vaginal prolapse

Presented at the 30th Annual Scientific Meeting of the American Urogynecologic Society, Hollywood, FL, Sept. 24-26, 2009.

Pelvic Floor Research Group, Division of Gynecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI

Received 6 July 2009; received in revised form 8 October 2009; accepted 4 January 2010.

Objective

The objective of the study was to compare pelvic structure location on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) during maximal Valsalva among women with posterior prolapse and those with normal support.

Study Design

Subjects (n = 37) had posterior vaginal wall (PVW) prolapse of +1 cm or greater. All underwent midsagittal, dynamic MRI. Structure locations (distal vagina, apex, perineal body, external anal sphincter) were determined. PVW length, levator and urogenital hiatus diameters, and prolapse diameter were measured.

Results

Subjects had more caudal structures (P < .001) and larger hiatus diameters (P < .005); the posterior wall was longer, whereas the straight-line distance between the apex and distal vagina was shorter. In enteroceles, the apex was more ventrally displaced compared with rectoceles (P = .003). Unlike apical descent (r = –0.3; P = .1), PVW length and point Bp were correlated with MRI prolapse size (r = 0.5; P = .002; r = 0.7; P < .001, respectively).

Conclusion

At maximal Valsalva on MRI, structures are more caudal in women with posterior prolapse. The posterior vaginal wall is longer; this length strongly correlates with prolapse size.

Key words: magnetic resonance imaging, posterior vaginal wall length, posterior vaginal wall prolapse

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Cite this article as: Lewicky-Gaupp C, Yousuf A, Larson KA, et al. Structural position of the posterior vagina and pelvic floor in women with and without posterior vaginal prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;202:497.e1-6.

 Reprints not available from the authors.

 This study was supported by the National Institutes of Health through the Office for Research on Women's Health Specialized Center of Research on Sex and Gender Factors Affecting Women's Health and the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development 1 P50 Grants HD044406 and R01 HD 38665.

PII: S0002-9378(10)00002-5

doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2010.01.001

American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 202, Issue 5 , Pages 497.e1-497.e6, May 2010