American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 202, Issue 5 , Pages 443.e1-443.e6, May 2010

Herbal use before and during pregnancy

Presented at the 11th Annual Meeting of the National Birth Defects Prevention Network, Washington, DC, Feb. 11-13, 2008, and the 57th Annual Epidemic Intelligence Service Conference, Atlanta, GA, April 14-18, 2008.

  • Cheryl S. Broussard, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Epidemic Intelligence Service, Office of Workforce and Career Development, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
    • Division of Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprints: Cheryl S. Broussard, PhD, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd., MS E-86, Atlanta, GA 30333
  • ,
  • Carol Louik, ScD

      Affiliations

    • Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston, MA
  • ,
  • Margaret A. Honein, PhD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Division of Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
  • ,
  • Allen A. Mitchell, MD

      Affiliations

    • Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston, MA
  • ,
  • National Birth Defects Prevention Study

Received 29 May 2009; received in revised form 27 August 2009; accepted 19 October 2009. published online 28 December 2009.

Objective

We estimated the prevalence and patterns of herbal use among US women before and during pregnancy.

Study Design

The National Birth Defects Prevention Study is an ongoing, population-based, case-control study. This analysis included 4239 women from 10 centers in the United States who delivered infants without major birth defects from 1998–2004.

Results

The prevalence of reported herbal use 3 months before or during pregnancy was 10.9%. During pregnancy, prevalence was 9.4% and was highest in the first trimester. Higher prevalence was associated with age greater than 30 years and education greater than 12 years. Use varied considerably by state (5–17%). Ginger and ephedra were the most commonly reported products early in pregnancy; teas and chamomile were most commonly reported throughout pregnancy.

Conclusion

Potentially 395,000 US births annually involve antenatal exposure to herbal products. Health care providers should inquire routinely about herbal use and educate patients about what little is known regarding risks of these products.

Key words: drug safety, ephedra, herbal preparation, pregnancy

 

 This study was supported in part by cooperative agreements under Program Announcement 02081 from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to the centers participating in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study, listed in the Acknowledgments section of the full-length article at www.AJOG.org.

 The findings are conclusions in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

 Cite this article as: Broussard CS, Louik C, Honein MA, et al. Herbal use before and during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;202:443.e1-6.

PII: S0002-9378(09)02003-1

doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2009.10.865

American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 202, Issue 5 , Pages 443.e1-443.e6, May 2010