« Previous
Next »
American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 201, Issue 4
, Pages 357.e1-357.e7
, October 2009
Second-stage labor duration in nulliparous women: relationship to maternal and perinatal outcomes
References
- . Influence of the duration of second stage labor on perinatal outcome and puerperal morbidity. Obstet Gynecol. 1977;49:266–269
- . Perinatal outcome after a prolonged second stage of labor. J Reprod Med. 1990;35:229–231
- . Perinatal outcome in relation to second-stage duration. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;173:906–912
- The prognostic impact of a prolonged second stage of labor on maternal and fetal outcome. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2002;81:214–221
- . Factors associated with a prolonged second state of labour: a case-controlled study of 364 nulliparous labours. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2003;23:255–257
- . Maternal and neonatal outcomes in patients with a prolonged second stage of labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102:52–58
- . How long is too long: does a prolonged second stage of labor in nulliparous women affect maternal and neonatal outcomes?. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:933–938
- Fetal pulse oximetry and cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:2195–2202
- . Dystocia and augmentation of labor: ACOG practice bulletin, no. 49. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102:1445–1454
- . Neonatal and maternal morbidity in relation to the length of the second stage of labour. BJOG. 1992;99:381–385
- . The effectiveness and costs of elective cesarean delivery for fetal macrosomia diagnosed by ultrasound. JAMA. 1996;276:1480–1486
Cite this article as: Rouse DJ, Weiner SJ, Bloom SL, et al. Second-stage labor duration in nulliparous women: relationship to maternal and perinatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;201:357.e1-7.
Reprints not available from the authors
Supported by Grants from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD21410, HD27860, HD27869, HD27915, HD27917, HD34116, HD34136, HD34208, HD40485, HD40500, HD40512, HD40544, HD40545, HD40560, and HD36801).
PII: S0002-9378(09)00900-4
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.08.003
© 2009 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 201, Issue 4
, Pages 357.e1-357.e7
, October 2009
