« Previous
Next »
American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 201, Issue 5
, Pages 516.e1-516.e7
, November 2009
Long-term efficacy of the pubovaginal Mersilene mesh sling
References
- . Sling procedures for stress urinary Incontinence. In: Walters MD, Karram MM editor. Urogynecology and reconstructive pelvic surgery. 3rd ed.. Philadelphia: Mosby Elsevier; 2007;
- . Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;CD001754
- Urinary incontinence treatment network (The expectations of patients who undergo surgery for stress incontinence). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198:308.e1–308.e6
- . Pathophysiology of female lower urinary tract dysfunction. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1998;25:747–756
- Is transobturator tape as effective as tension-free vaginal tape in patients with borderline maximum urethral closure pressure?. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195:1799–1804
- . Q-tip test in stress urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1972;38:313
- . Q-tip test: a study of continent and incontinent women. Obstet Gynecol. 1987;70:208–211
- . Clinical and urodynamic features of intrinsic sphincter deficiency. Neurourol Urodynamics. 2003;22:264–268
- . Treatment options for patients with suboptimal response to surgery for stress urinary incontinence. Curr Med Res Opin. 2007;23:285–292
- Comparison of the treatment outcome of pubovaginal sling, tension-free vaginal tape, and transobturator tape for stress urinary incontinence with intrinsic sphincter deficiency. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199:76.e1–76.e4
- . Mersilene mesh sling: short- and long-term clinical and urodynamic outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185:32–40
- The long term (5-years) objective TVT success rate does not depend on predictive factors at multivariate analysis: a multicentre retrospective study. Europ Urol. 2008;53:176–182
- Effectiveness of tension-free vaginal tape compared with transobturator tape in women with stress urinary incontinence and intrinsic sphincter deficiency (a randomized controlled trial). Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112:1253–1261
- . The Mersilene mesh suburethral sling: a clinical and urodynamic evaluation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;173:1719–1726
- . The gauze-hammock operation. J Obstet Gynecol Br Commonw. 1968;75:1–13
- . The Mersilene mesh gauze-hammock for severe urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1973;41:88–93
- . Choice of operation for urinary stress incontinence. In: Nichols DH, Randall CL editor. Vaginal surgery. 4th ed.. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1996;p. 384–421
- . Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193:103–113
- . Short forms to assess life quality and symptom distress for urinary incontinence in women: the incontinence impact questionnaire and the urogenital distress inventory. Neurourol Urodyn. 1995;14:131–139
- . Suburethral slings for treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 1994;5:228–239
- . On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Ann Stat. 1947;18:50–60
- . A comparison of approximate interval estimators for the Bernoulli parameter. Am Stat. 1996;50:63–68
- . Eleven years prospective follow-up of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure for treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2008;19:1043–1047
- . Long-term efficacy of tension-free vaginal tape in the management of stress urinary incontinence in women: efficacy at 5- and 7-year follow-up. Int Urogynecol J. 2008;19:1509–1512
- . Q-tip test and tension-free vaginal tape in the management of female patients with genuine stress incontinence. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2002;53:170–173
Cite this article as: Young SB, Howard AE, Illanes DS, et al. Long-term efficacy of the pubovaginal Mersilene mesh sling. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;201:516.e1-7.
This study was supported in part by the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, UMass Memorial Medical Center, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA.
The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the Armed Forces.
PII: S0002-9378(09)00769-8
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.07.003
© 2009 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 201, Issue 5
, Pages 516.e1-516.e7
, November 2009
