American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 201, Issue 3 , Pages 266.e1-266.e5, September 2009

Placenta previa: distance to internal os and mode of delivery

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy

Received 30 September 2008; received in revised form 5 December 2008; accepted 1 June 2009. published online 27 July 2009.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to relate the mode of delivery and outcomes in a cohort of cases of placenta previa that had the last transvaginal ultrasonographic scan <28 days before delivery.

Study Design

Cases in which the placental edge overlapped the internal cervical (n = 42) underwent cesarean section delivery. Labor was allowed in those with placental edge to internal os distance of 1-10 mm (group 1, 24 women) and those with a distance of 11-20 mm (group 2, 29 women).

Results

Rates of cesarean section delivery (75% vs 31%; odds ratio, 6.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2–22) and of bleeding before labor (29% vs 3%; odds ratio, 11.5; 95% CI, 1.6–76.7) were higher in group 1 than in group 2. Blood loss at delivery (662 ± 466 mL vs 510 ± 547 mL) and rate of severe postpartum hemorrhage (21% vs 10%; odds ratio, 2.3; 95% CI, 0.5–9.7) were similar in the 2 groups.

Conclusion

More than two-thirds of women with a placental edge to cervical os distance of >10 mm deliver vaginally without increased risk of hemorrhage.

Key words: cesarean section delivery, placenta previa, transvaginal sonography

 

 Cite this article as: Vergani P, Ornaghi S, Pozzi I, et al. Placenta previa: distance to internal os and mode of delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;201:266.e1-5.

 Authorship and contribution to the article is limited to the 7 authors indicated. There was no outside funding or technical assistance with the production of this article.

PII: S0002-9378(09)00629-2

doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2009.06.009

Refers to article:

  • Cross-reference A new classification of placenta previa: Measuring progress in obstetrics

    Lawrence W. Oppenheimer, Dan Farine
    American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology September 2009 (Vol. 201, Issue 3, Pages 227-229)

American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 201, Issue 3 , Pages 266.e1-266.e5, September 2009