American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 201, Issue 5 , Pages 488.e1-488.e7, November 2009

Value of p16INK4a as a marker of progression/regression in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1

  • Marta del Pino, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IDIBAPS-Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona Faculty of Medicine, Barcelona, Spain
  • ,
  • Sònia Garcia, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IDIBAPS-Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona Faculty of Medicine, Barcelona, Spain
  • ,
  • Victòria Fusté, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pathology, IDIBAPS-Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona Faculty of Medicine, Barcelona, Spain
  • ,
  • Immaculada Alonso, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IDIBAPS-Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona Faculty of Medicine, Barcelona, Spain
  • ,
  • Pere Fusté, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IDIBAPS-Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona Faculty of Medicine, Barcelona, Spain
  • ,
  • Aureli Torné, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IDIBAPS-Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona Faculty of Medicine, Barcelona, Spain
  • ,
  • Jaume Ordi, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pathology, IDIBAPS-Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona Faculty of Medicine, Barcelona, Spain

Received 24 December 2008; received in revised form 12 February 2009; accepted 26 May 2009. published online 17 August 2009.

Objective

The objective of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of p16INK4a staining to classify cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 according to its progression/regression risk.

Study Design

Patients with a histologic diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 were prospectively recruited (n = 138). Simultaneous detection of high-risk human papillomaviruses and p16INK4a evaluation were performed. Follow-up was conducted every 6 months by cytology and colposcopy and annually by high-risk human papillomavirus testing, for at least 12 months (mean, 29.0). Progression was defined as a histologic diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades 2-3, regression as a negative cytology and high-risk human papillomaviruses, and persistence as a cytologic result of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and/or a positive test for high-risk human papillomaviruses.

Results

Progression was observed in 14 women (10.1%), 66 (47.6%) regressed, and 58 (42.0%) had a persistent disease. p16INK4a was positive in 77 (55.8%) initial biopsy specimens. Progression to cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades 2-3 was identified in 14 of 77 (18.2%) women with positive and none of 61 (0.00%) women with negative p16INK4a immunostaining (P < .001).

Conclusion

p16INK4a negative cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 lesions rarely progress and may benefit from a less intensive follow-up.

Key words: cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, CIN1, follow-up, human papillomavirus, immunohistochemistry, p16INK4a, progression, regression

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Cite this article as: del Pino M, Garcia S, Fusté V, et al. Value of p16INK4a as a marker of progression/regression in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;201:488.e1-7.

 Reprints not available from the authors.

PII: S0002-9378(09)00557-2

doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2009.05.046

American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 201, Issue 5 , Pages 488.e1-488.e7, November 2009