American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 201, Issue 3 , Pages 260.e1-260.e3, September 2009

How valid are current cervical cancer prognostic factors that are used to recommend adjunctive radiation therapy after radical surgery?

  • William T. Creasman, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
    • ,
  • Matthew Kohler, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
    • ,
  • Jeffrey E. Korte, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics, and Epidemiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC

Received 11 November 2008; accepted 9 April 2009. published online 19 June 2009.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.

 Cite this article as: Creasman WT, Kohler M, Korte JE. How valid are current cervical cancer prognostic factors that are used to recommend adjunctive radiation therapy after radical surgery? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;201:260.e1-3.

 Reprints not available from the authors.

 Authorship and contribution to the article is limited to the 3 authors indicated. There was no outside funding or technical assistance with the production of this article.

PII: S0002-9378(09)00406-2

doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2009.04.020

American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 201, Issue 3 , Pages 260.e1-260.e3, September 2009

Article Tools