American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 200, Issue 6 , Pages 681.e1-681.e7 , June 2009

Global measures of quality- and patient safety-related childbirth outcomes: should we monitor adverse or ideal rates?

Presented at the 75th Annual Meeting of the Pacific Coast Obstetrical and Gynecological Society, Victoria, BC, Canada, Oct. 15-19, 2008.

  • Kimberly D. Gregory, MD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Department Obstetrics and Gynecology, Burns Allen Research Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, David Geffen School of Medicine, and the Department of Community Health Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA
    • ,
  • Moshe Fridman, PhD

      Affiliations

    • AMF Consulting, Los Angeles, CA
    • ,
  • Sonal Shah, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Department Obstetrics and Gynecology, Burns Allen Research Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
    • ,
  • Lisa M. Korst, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.

Received 15 August 2008 ,Revised 31 December 2008 ,Accepted 26 February 2009.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.

 Cite this article as: Gregory KD, Fridman M, Shah S, et al. Global measures of quality- and patient safety-related childbirth outcomes: should we monitor adverse or ideal rates? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;200:681.e1-681.e7.

 Reprints not available from the authors.

PII: S0002-9378(09)00224-5

doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.02.033

American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 200, Issue 6 , Pages 681.e1-681.e7 , June 2009

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution