American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 200, Issue 6 , Pages 674.e1-674.e7 , June 2009

Reduction of elective inductions in a large community hospital

Presented at the 75th Annual Meeting of the Pacific Coast Obstetrical and Gynecological Society, Victoria, BC, Canada, Oct. 15-19, 2008.

  • Dale P. Reisner, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Perinatal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, WA
    • Obstetrix Medical Group of Washington, Seattle, WA
  • ,
  • Terri K. Wallin, RN, MHA

      Affiliations

    • Home Care Services, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, WA
  • ,
  • Rosalee W. Zingheim, RN, MN

      Affiliations

    • Department of Clinical Effectiveness, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, WA
  • ,
  • David A. Luthy, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Perinatal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, WA
    • Obstetrix Medical Group of Washington, Seattle, WA

Received 15 September 2008 ,Revised 10 December 2008 ,Accepted 26 February 2009.

References 

  1. Macer JA, Macer CL, Chan LS. Elective induction versus spontaneous labor: a retrospective study of complications and outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;166:1690–1696
  2. Sorensen TK, Williams MA, Zingheim RW, Reisner DP, Luthy DA. Evaluation of a program to introduce active management of labor in a large urban hospital. Presented at the XIV Annual Meeting of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists District XIII, San Diego, CA 1995;
  3. Yeast JD, Jones A, Poskin M. Induction of labor and the relationship to cesarean delivery: a review of 7001 consecutive inductions. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180:628–633
  4. Seyb ST, Berka RJ, Socol ML, Dooley SL. Risk of cesarean delivery with elective induction of labor at term in nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;94:600–607
  5. Coonrod DV, Bay RC, Kishi GY. Epidemiology of labor induction: Arizona, 1997. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;182:1355–1362
  6. Maslow AS, Sweeny AL. Elective induction of labor as a risk factor for cesarean delivery among low-risk women at term. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95:917–922
  7. Boulvain M, Marcoux S, Bureau M, Fortier M, Fraser W. Risks of induction of labour in uncomplicated term pregnancies. Pediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2001;15:131–139
  8. Cammu H, Martens G, Ruyssinck G, Amy J. Outcome after elective labor induction in nulliparous women: a matched cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186:240–244
  9. Kaufman KE, Bailit FJ, Grobman W. Elective induction: an analysis of economic and health consequences. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187:858–863
  10. Johnson DP, Davis NR, Brown AJ. Risk of cesarean delivery after induction at term in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188:1565–1572
  11. Ben-Haroush A, Yogev Y, Bar J, Glickman H, Kaplan B, Hod M. Indicated labor induction with vaginal prostaglandin E2 increases the risk of cesarean section even in multiparous women with no previous cesarean section. J Perinatal Med. 2004;32;:31–36
  12. Rayburn W. Minimizing the risks from elective induction of labor. J Reprod Med. 2007;52:671–676
  13. Batista L, Chung JH, Lagrew DC, Wing DA. Complications of labor induction among multiparous women in a community-based hospital system. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197:241;e1-7

 Cite this article as: Reisner DP, Wallin TK, Zingheim RW, et al. Reduction of elective inductions in a large community hospital. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;200:674.e1-674.e7.

 Reprints not available from the authors.

PII: S0002-9378(09)00210-5

doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.02.021

American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 200, Issue 6 , Pages 674.e1-674.e7 , June 2009