American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 201, Issue 1 , Pages 17.e1-17.e8, July 2009

Follow-up after treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by human papillomavirus genotyping

  • Sophia Brismar, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department for Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska University Hospital–Huddinge, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
  • ,
  • Bo Johansson, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Clinical Virology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital–Huddinge, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
  • ,
  • Malin Borjesson, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department for Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska University Hospital–Huddinge, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
  • ,
  • Marc Arbyn, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Unit of Cancer Epidemiology, Scientific Institute of Public Health, Brussels, Belgium
  • ,
  • Sonia Andersson, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department for Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska University Hospital–Huddinge, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprints: Sonia Andersson, MD, PhD, Department for Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Karolinska University Hospital–Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, 141 86 Stockholm, Sweden

Received 29 July 2008; received in revised form 31 October 2008; accepted 12 January 2009. published online 06 April 2009.

Objective

To assess the use of human papillomavirus genotyping in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia posttreatment follow-up.

Study Design

Prospective observational study. Ninety women underwent cytologic testing and human papillomavirus genotyping at the follow-up visit after conization. Cones were retrospectively genotyped. A second cytologic follow-up was performed.

Results

Margin status and presence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3+ in the cone were poor predictors of treatment outcome (sensitivity, < 50%; diagnostic odds ratio, ≤ 2.5). Presence of high-/intermediate-risk human papillomavirus types predicted 100% of residual high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion/cervical intraepithelial 2+ at a specificity of 73%. Testing only 13 high-risk types showed equal sensitivity but higher specificity (86%; P < .01). Persistent high-risk human papillomavirous infection (13 types) detected high-grade residual disease with a sensitivity of 60% at a very high specificity (95%), resulting in a positive predictive value of 43%, which exceeded the positive predictive values of all other criteria.

Conclusion

Testing for high-risk human papillomavirus identified all recurrent/residual high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Focusing on women with persistent human papillomavirus types through genotyping substantially increased positive predictive value but at a loss in sensitivity.

Key words: cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, conization, genotyping, human papillomavirus recurrence

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This study was supported by the Directorate of SANCO, Luxembourg, Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg; European Commission, through the European Cooperation on Development and Implementation of Cancer Screening and Prevention Guidelines, IARC, Lyons, France; Grants from the Swedish Cancer Foundation, the Swedish Research Council, and the Medical Research Council, as well as the Cancer Society in Stockholm, Sweden; the Stockholm County Council, Sweden; the Swedish Labour Market Insurance; the Federal Service for Science, Culture and Technology, Brussels, Belgium (DWTC/SSTC); and the Institute for the Promotion of Innovation by Science and Technology (IWT) in Flanders, project no. 060081.

 Cite this article as: Brismar S, Johansson B, Borjesson M, et al. Follow-up after treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by human papillomavirus genotyping. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;201:17.e1-8.

PII: S0002-9378(09)00011-8

doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2009.01.005

American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 201, Issue 1 , Pages 17.e1-17.e8, July 2009