American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 200, Issue 1 , Pages 66.e1-66.e6, January 2009

Abnormal endothelium-dependent microvascular dilator reactivity in pregnancies complicated by normotensive intrauterine growth restriction

  • Corine M. Koopmans, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
    • Department of Biomedical Engineering, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Judith Blaauw, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
    • Department of Biomedical Engineering, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Maria G. van Pampus, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Gerhard Rakhorst, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biomedical Engineering, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Jan G. Aarnoudse, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

Received 11 February 2008; received in revised form 28 April 2008; accepted 8 July 2008. published online 17 September 2008.

Objective

Normotensive intrauterine growth restriction and preeclampsia share a similar placenta pathophysiology, whereas maternal clinical manifestations differ. Clinical symptoms of preeclampsia are partly attributed to vascular endothelial dysfunction, but it is unclear whether this phenomenon plays a role in intrauterine growth restriction. Therefore, we investigated microvascular endothelial function in women with intrauterine growth restriction.

Study Design

Laser Doppler fluxmetry was used combined with iontophoresis of acetylcholine and sodium nitroprusside, namely, endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent vasodilators. We studied 12 women with intrauterine growth restriction and 16 controls in the third trimester of pregnancy. All women had prepregnancy body mass indexes < 26.

Results

Acetylcholine-mediated vasodilatation was significantly increased in women with intrauterine growth restriction compared with controls (743% ± 120% vs 390% ± 67%, P = .01); sodium nitroprusside-mediated vasodilatation was not different (360% ± 55% vs 363% ± 65%, P > .99).

Conclusion

Nonobese women with normotensive intrauterine growth restriction show abnormal endothelium-dependent microvascular vasodilatation, suggesting endothelial dysfunction as in preeclampsia. Obviously, for the clinical manifestation of preeclampsia additional factors are required, and a role of metabolic syndrome and obesity has been suggested.

Key words: abnormal endothelial function, acetylcholine, iontophoresis, microcirculation, normotensive intrauterine growth restriction

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Cite this article as: Koopmans CM, Blaauw J, van Pampus MG, et al. Abnormal endothelium-dependent microvascular dilator reactivity in pregnancies complicated by normotensive intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;200:66.e1-66.e6.

 Reprints not available from the authors.

PII: S0002-9378(08)00803-X

doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2008.07.022

American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 200, Issue 1 , Pages 66.e1-66.e6, January 2009