Volume 200, Issue 1 , Pages 48.e1-48.e8, January 2009
Obstetricians' choice of cesarean delivery in ambiguous cases: is it influenced by risk attitude or fear of complaints and litigation?
Objective
The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that obstetricians' choice of delivery method is influenced by their risk attitude and perceived risk of complaints and malpractice litigation.
Study Design
The choice of delivery method in ambiguous cases was studied in a nationwide survey of Norwegian obstetricians (n = 716; response rate, 71%) using clinical scenarios. The risk attitude was measured by 6 items from the Jackson Personality Inventory-Revised.
Results
The proportion of obstetricians consenting to the cesarean request varied both within and across the scenarios. The perceived risk of complaints and malpractice litigation was a clear determinant of obstetricians' choice of cesarean in all of the clinical scenarios, whereas no impact was observed for risk attitude.
Conclusion
Obstetricians' judgments about cesarean request in ambiguous clinical cases vary considerably. Perceived risk of complaints and litigation is associated with compliance with the requested cesarean.
Key words: cesarean section, fear of litigation, maternal request, risk attitude
Cite this article as: Fuglenes D, Øian P, Kristiansen IS. Obstetricians' choice of cesarean delivery in ambiguous cases: is it influenced by risk attitude or fear of complaints and litigation? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;200:48.e1-48.e8.
This study was financed by the University of Oslo.
PII: S0002-9378(08)00802-8
doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2008.07.021
© 2009 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 200, Issue 1 , Pages 48.e1-48.e8, January 2009
