« Previous
Next »
American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 200, Issue 1
, Pages 56.e1-56.e6
, January 2009
Can a prediction model for vaginal birth after cesarean also predict the probability of morbidity related to a trial of labor?
References
- . Comparison of a trial of labor with an elecitve second cesarean section. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:689–695
- . Perinatal outcomes after successful and failed trials of labor after cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196:583.e1–583.e5
- . Safety of vaginal birth after cesarean: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103:420–429
- Is vaginal birth after cesarean or elective repeat cesarean safer in women with a prior vaginal delivery?. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195:1143–1147
- . Trial of labor after cesarean delivery: the effect of previous vaginal delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;179:938–941
- Outcomes of induction of labor after one prior cesarean. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109(2 Pt 1):262–269
- Development of a nomogram for prediction of a vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:806–812
- Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2581–2589
- . Categorical data analysis. In: New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1990;p. 100–102
- . Cesarean delivery: background, trends, and epidemiology. Semin Perinatol. 2006;30:235–241
- Maternal complications with vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193:1656–1662
Cite this article as: Grobman WA, Lai Y, Landon MB, et al. Can a prediction model for vaginal birth after cesarean also predict the probability of morbidity related to a trial of labor? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;200:56.e1-56.e6.
This study was supported by Grants from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD21410, HD21414, HD27860, HD27861, HD27869, HD27905, HD27915, HD27917, HD34116, HD34122, HD34136, HD34208, HD34210, HD40500, HD40485, HD40544, HD40545, HD40560, HD40512, and HD36801).
Reprints not available from the authors.
PII: S0002-9378(08)00660-1
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.06.039
© 2009 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 200, Issue 1
, Pages 56.e1-56.e6
, January 2009
