« Previous
Next »
American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 199, Issue 1
, Pages 32.e1-32.e5
, July 2008
Higher maximum doses of oxytocin are associated with an unacceptably high risk for uterine rupture in patients attempting vaginal birth after cesarean delivery
References
- Maternal complications with vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: A multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193:1656–1662
- Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2581–2589
- . Births: Final data for 2004. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2006;55:1–101
- . Oxytocin dose and the risk of uterine rupture in trial of labor after cesarean. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;97:381–384
- . Goodness-of-fit and diagnostics for proportional hazards regression models. Cancer Treat Res. 1995;75:95–112
- . Uterine rupture during induced or augmented labor in gravid women with one prior cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;181:882–886
- . Uterine rupture during induced trial of labor among women with previous cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183:1176–1179
- . Risk of uterine rupture in labor induction of patients with prior cesarean section: an inner city hospital experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190:1476–1478
- The MFMU Cesarean Registry: Factors affecting the success of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193:1016–1023
- . Does a maximum dose of oxytocin affect risk for uterine rupture in candidates for vaginal birth after cesarean delivery?. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197:495;e1-5
Cite this article as: Cahill AG, Waterman BM, Stamilio DM, et al. Higher maximum doses of oxytocin are associated with an unacceptably high risk for uterine rupture in patients attempting vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199:32.e1-32.e5.
Reprints not available from the authors.
This work was supported by Grants R01 HD 35631 and K24 HD01289, both from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (to G.A.M.).
PII: S0002-9378(08)00262-7
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.03.001
© 2008 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 199, Issue 1
, Pages 32.e1-32.e5
, July 2008
