American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 199, Issue 2 , Pages 105.e1-105.e7, August 2008

Improved outcomes, fewer cesarean deliveries, and reduced litigation: results of a new paradigm in patient safety

Received 16 October 2007; received in revised form 26 November 2007; accepted 14 February 2008. published online 12 May 2008.

In a health care delivery system with an annual delivery rate of approximately 220,000, a comprehensive redesign of patient safety process was undertaken based on the following principles: (1) uniform processes and procedure result in an improved quality; (2) every member of the obstetric team should be required to halt any process that is deemed to be dangerous; (3) cesarean delivery is best viewed as a process alternative, not an outcome or quality endpoint; (4) malpractice loss is best avoided by reduction in adverse outcomes and the development of unambiguous practice guidelines; and (5) effective peer review is essential to quality medical practice yet may be impossible to achieve at a local level in some departments. Since the inception of this program, we have seen improvements in patient outcomes, a dramatic decline in litigation claims, and a reduction in the primary cesarean delivery rate.

Key words: litigation, patient outcomes, patient safety, quality medical practice

 

 Reprints not available from the authors.

 Cite this article as: Clark SL, Belfort MA, Byrum SL, et al. Improved outcomes, fewer cesarean deliveries, and reduced litigation: results of a new paradigm in patient safety. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199:105.e1-105.e7.

PII: S0002-9378(08)00193-2

doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2008.02.031

American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 199, Issue 2 , Pages 105.e1-105.e7, August 2008