« Previous
Next »
American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 198, Issue 4
, Pages 452.e1-452.e12
, April 2008
Vaginal birth after cesarean: clinical risk factors associated with adverse outcome
References
- . Brief history of vaginal birth after cesarean section. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2001;44:604–608
- . Conservatism in obstetrics. N Y Med J. 1916;104:1–3
- Cesarean section and its place in modern obstetric practice. J Obstet Gynecol Br Commonw. 1971;78:203–214
- . The technique of cesarean section with special reference to the lower uterine segment incision. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1926;12:729–731
- . Vaginal delivery following cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1951;61:1232–1242
- . Management of pregnancy and delivery following cesarean delivery. JAMA. 1951;145:884–888
- . Vaginal delivery after cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1961;81:501–510
- . Delivery following cesarean section. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1959;2:1029–1042
- . Cesarean childbirth. National Institutes of Health publication no. 82-2067 Washington (DC): Government Printing Office; 1981;
- . Vaginal birth after cesarean: A meta-analysis of morbidity and mortality. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;77:465–470
- . Elective repeat cesarean delivery versus trial of labor: A meta-analysis of the literature from 1989 to 1999. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183:1187–1197
- Safety of vaginal birth after cesarean: A systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103:420–429
- Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:689–695
- . Predicting vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: A review of prognostic factors and screening tools. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190:547–555
- . Vital statistics linked birth/infant death and hospital discharge record linkage for epidemiological studies. Comput Biomed Res. 1997;30:290–305
- Engaging nurse leaders in health services research. J Nursing Admin. 2007;52:349–358
- Vaginal birth after cesarean: Do hospital policies adhere to national guidelines?. J Reprod Med. 2007;52:349–358
- . Using the ICD-9 coding system to identify indications for both primary and repeat cesarean sections. Am J Public Health. 1995;85:1143–1146
- Elective repeat cesarean delivery versus trial of labor: A prospective multicenter study. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;77:465–470
- Is vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) or elective repeat cesarean safer in women with a prior vaginal delivery?. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195:1143–1147
- The MFMU Cesarean Registry: Factors affecting the success of trail of labor after previous cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193:1016–1023
- . Variables associated with successful vaginal birth after one cesarean section: A proposed vaginal birth after cesarean section score. Am J Perinatol. 2004;21:447–453
- . Interdelivery interval and the success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;99:41–44
- Identifying priorities in methodological research using ICD-9 CM and ICD-10 administrative data: Report from an international consortium. BMC Health Services Res. 2006;6:77
- . How do we maximize the impact of the public reporting of quality of care?. Int J Qual Health Care. 2004;1:157–163
- . Patient choice cesarean: An evidence-based review. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2004;59:601–616
- . Mode of delivery and subsequent stress response. Lancet. 2000;355:120
- . Labor: An immunologically beneficial process for the neonate. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;171:1271–1272
- Caesarean section and gastrointestinal symptoms, atopic dermatitis, and sensitisation during the first year of life. Arch Dis Child. 2004;89:993–997
- . Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: Practice patterns of obstetrician-gynecologists. J Reprod Med. 2005;50:261–266
Supported by Agency for Healthcare Quality and Research Grant R01 HS011334 (to K.D.G.).
Reprints not available from the authors.
Cite this article as: Gregory KD, Korst LM, Fridman M, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean: clinical risk factors associated with adverse outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;198:452.e1-452.e12.
PII: S0002-9378(08)00023-9
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.01.008
© 2008 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 198, Issue 4
, Pages 452.e1-452.e12
, April 2008
