American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 198, Issue 4 , Pages 452.e1-452.e12 , April 2008

Vaginal birth after cesarean: clinical risk factors associated with adverse outcome

Presented at the 26th Annual Meeting of the American Gynecological and Obstetrical Society, Chicago, IL, Sept. 26-29, 2007.

  • Kimberly D. Gregory, MD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
  • ,
  • Lisa M. Korst, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
  • ,
  • Moshe Fridman, PhD

      Affiliations

    • AMF Consulting, Los Angeles, CA
  • ,
  • Ida Shihady, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
  • ,
  • Paula Broussard, RN

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
  • ,
  • Arlene Fink, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, Department of Health Services, School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, CA.
  • ,
  • Linda Burnes Bolton, RN, DrPH

      Affiliations

    • Nursing Research Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA

Received 16 April 2007 ,Revised 3 December 2007 ,Accepted 11 January 2008.

References 

  1. Cohen B, Atkins M. Brief history of vaginal birth after cesarean section. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2001;44:604–608
  2. Cragin EB. Conservatism in obstetrics. N Y Med J. 1916;104:1–3
  3. Case BD, Corcoran R, Jeffcoate N, et al. Cesarean section and its place in modern obstetric practice. J Obstet Gynecol Br Commonw. 1971;78:203–214
  4. Kerr JM. The technique of cesarean section with special reference to the lower uterine segment incision. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1926;12:729–731
  5. Schmitze HE, Gajew CJ. Vaginal delivery following cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1951;61:1232–1242
  6. Cosgrove RA. Management of pregnancy and delivery following cesarean delivery. JAMA. 1951;145:884–888
  7. Riva JL, Teich JC. Vaginal delivery after cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1961;81:501–510
  8. Kaltreider DF, Krone WF. Delivery following cesarean section. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1959;2:1029–1042
  9. National Institutes of Health. Cesarean childbirth. National Institutes of Health publication no. 82-2067 Washington (DC): Government Printing Office; 1981;
  10. Rosen MG, Dickinson JF, Westhoff CI. Vaginal birth after cesarean: A meta-analysis of morbidity and mortality. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;77:465–470
  11. Mozurkewich EL, Hutton EK. Elective repeat cesarean delivery versus trial of labor: A meta-analysis of the literature from 1989 to 1999. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183:1187–1197
  12. Guise JM, Berlin M, McDonagh M, et al. Safety of vaginal birth after cesarean: A systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103:420–429
  13. McMahon MJ, Luterh ER, Bowes WA, et al. Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:689–695
  14. Hashima JN, Eden KB, Osterweil P, Nygren P, Guise JM. Predicting vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: A review of prognostic factors and screening tools. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190:547–555
  15. Herrchen B, Gould J, Nesbitt T. Vital statistics linked birth/infant death and hospital discharge record linkage for epidemiological studies. Comput Biomed Res. 1997;30:290–305
  16. Burnes Bolton L, Shihady I, Bennett C, et al. Engaging nurse leaders in health services research. J Nursing Admin. 2007;52:349–358
  17. Shihady I, Broussard P, Burnes Bolton L, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean: Do hospital policies adhere to national guidelines?. J Reprod Med. 2007;52:349–358
  18. Henry OA, Gregory KD, Hobel CJ, Platt LD. Using the ICD-9 coding system to identify indications for both primary and repeat cesarean sections. Am J Public Health. 1995;85:1143–1146
  19. Flamm BL, Going JR, Liu YN, et al. Elective repeat cesarean delivery versus trial of labor: A prospective multicenter study. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;77:465–470
  20. Cahill AG, Stamilio Dm, Odibo AO, et al. Is vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) or elective repeat cesarean safer in women with a prior vaginal delivery?. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195:1143–1147
  21. Landon MB, Leindecker S, Spong CY, et al. NICHD Matenal Fetal Medicine Units Network The MFMU Cesarean Registry: Factors affecting the success of trail of labor after previous cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193:1016–1023
  22. Gonen R, Tamir A, Degani S, Ohel G. Variables associated with successful vaginal birth after one cesarean section: A proposed vaginal birth after cesarean section score. Am J Perinatol. 2004;21:447–453
  23. Huang WH, Nakashima KD, Rumney PJ, Keegan KA, Chan K. Interdelivery interval and the success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;99:41–44
  24. De Coster C, Quan H, Finlayson A, et al. Identifying priorities in methodological research using ICD-9 CM and ICD-10 administrative data: Report from an international consortium. BMC Health Services Res. 2006;6:77
  25. Marshall MN, Romana PS, Davies HTO. How do we maximize the impact of the public reporting of quality of care?. Int J Qual Health Care. 2004;1:157–163
  26. Wax JR, Cartin A, Pinette MG, Blackstone J. Patient choice cesarean: An evidence-based review. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2004;59:601–616
  27. Taylor A, Fisk NM, Glover V. Mode of delivery and subsequent stress response. Lancet. 2000;355:120
  28. Thilaganathan B, Meher-Homji N, Nicolaides KH. Labor: An immunologically beneficial process for the neonate. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;171:1271–1272
  29. Laubereau B, Filipiak-Pittroff B, von Berg A, et al. GINI Study Group Caesarean section and gastrointestinal symptoms, atopic dermatitis, and sensitisation during the first year of life. Arch Dis Child. 2004;89:993–997
  30. Coleman VH, Erickson K, Schulkin J, Zinberg S, Sachs BP. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: Practice patterns of obstetrician-gynecologists. J Reprod Med. 2005;50:261–266

 Supported by Agency for Healthcare Quality and Research Grant R01 HS011334 (to K.D.G.).

 Reprints not available from the authors.

 Cite this article as: Gregory KD, Korst LM, Fridman M, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean: clinical risk factors associated with adverse outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;198:452.e1-452.e12.

PII: S0002-9378(08)00023-9

doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.01.008

American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 198, Issue 4 , Pages 452.e1-452.e12 , April 2008