American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 199, Issue 1 , Pages 26.e1-26.e8, July 2008

Evaluation of primary cervical cancer screening with an oncogenic human papillomavirus DNA test and cervical cytologic findings among women who attended family planning clinics in the United States

  • Janet G. Baseman, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprints: Janet G. Baseman, PhD, MPH, 1107 NE 45th St, Suite 405-F, Seattle, WA 98103.
  • ,
  • Shalini L. Kulasingam, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University, Durham, NC
  • ,
  • Tiffany G. Harris, PhD

      Affiliations

    • New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York, NY
  • ,
  • James P. Hughes, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
  • ,
  • Nancy B. Kiviat, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
  • ,
  • Constance Mao, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
  • ,
  • Laura A. Koutsky, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA

Received 26 April 2007; accepted 26 November 2007. published online 04 March 2008.

Objective

Our goal was to evaluate the performance of screening with (1) Papanicolaou and human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing and (2) Papanicolaou testing with reflex HPV testing of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance for detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or more in clinics that serve low-income women in the United States.

Study Design

There were 4799 women who were recruited primarily from Planned Parenthood clinics and who were screened with liquid-based Papanicolaou testing and HPV DNA testing and referred for biopsy based on a positive test result for oncogenic HPV DNA or a Papanicolaou test that showed atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or more.

Results

Among 931 women who were 30-50 years of age, the sensitivity of reflex HPV testing was 53.8% (range, 38.2%-72.3%). The sensitivity of HPV DNA and Papanicolaou testing was 91% (range, 74.6%-100%). The specificity of reflex HPV testing was 95.1% (range, 93.8%-96.3%). Generally, the specificity of HPV DNA and Papanicolaou testing was low.

Conclusion

Among US women who are ≥30 years old, HPV DNA and Papanicolaou testing is a reasonable cervical cancer screening strategy.

Key words: cervical cancer, human papillomavirus (HPV), screening

 

 Cite this article as: Baseman JG, Kulasingam SL, Harris TG, et al. Evaluation of primary cervical cancer screening with an oncogenic human papillomavirus DNA test and cervical cytologic findings among women who attended family planning clinics in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199:26.e1-26.e8.

PII: S0002-9378(07)02235-1

doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2007.11.051

American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 199, Issue 1 , Pages 26.e1-26.e8, July 2008