American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 198, Issue 5 , Pages 521.e1-521.e6, May 2008

Is a breech presentation at term more frequent in women with a history of cesarean delivery?

  • Françoise Vendittelli, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Association des Utilisateurs de Dossiers Informatisés en Pédiatrie, Obstétrique et Gynécologie (AUDIPOG) sentinel network, Lyon, France
    • Clermont-Ferrand Maternity University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprints: Dr Vendittelli Françoise, CHU de Clermont-Ferrand, Fédération de Gynécologie-Obstétrique, Maternité de l'Hôtel-Dieu, Boulevard Léon Malfreyt, 63058 Clermont-Ferrand cedex 1.
  • ,
  • Olivier Rivière

      Affiliations

    • Association des Utilisateurs de Dossiers Informatisés en Pédiatrie, Obstétrique et Gynécologie (AUDIPOG) sentinel network, Lyon, France
    • Faculté de Médecine RTH Laennec, Lyon, France
  • ,
  • Catherine Crenn-Hébert, MD

      Affiliations

    • Association des Utilisateurs de Dossiers Informatisés en Pédiatrie, Obstétrique et Gynécologie (AUDIPOG) sentinel network, Lyon, France
    • Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, AP-HP, Hôpital Louis Mourier, Colombes, France.
  • ,
  • Marc-Alain Rozan, MD

      Affiliations

    • Association des Utilisateurs de Dossiers Informatisés en Pédiatrie, Obstétrique et Gynécologie (AUDIPOG) sentinel network, Lyon, France
  • ,
  • Bernard Maria, MD

      Affiliations

    • Association des Utilisateurs de Dossiers Informatisés en Pédiatrie, Obstétrique et Gynécologie (AUDIPOG) sentinel network, Lyon, France
  • ,
  • Bernard Jacquetin, MD

      Affiliations

    • Association des Utilisateurs de Dossiers Informatisés en Pédiatrie, Obstétrique et Gynécologie (AUDIPOG) sentinel network, Lyon, France
    • Clermont-Ferrand Maternity University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France
    • Auvergne Medical University, Clermont-Ferrand, France
  • ,
  • obstetricians of the AUDIPOG Sentinel Network

Received 4 May 2007; received in revised form 19 August 2007; accepted 5 November 2007. published online 13 February 2008.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to determine whether breech presentation at term is more common among women with at least 1 previous cesarean delivery.

Study Design

This historic cohort study (n = 84,688) included women with a singleton term pregnancy and at least 1 previous delivery. Results were expressed as crude relative risks and adjusted odds ratios.

Results

While 2.46% of women had a fetus in breech presentation at term, 14.91% of women had had 1 or more previous cesareans. The relative risk of a breech presentation at term for women with a history of cesarean was 2.18 (95%CI: 1.98-2.39). It did not differ according to the number of previous cesareans. The logistic regression analysis took into account confounding factors including gestational age, maternal age, parity, birthweight, and oligohydramnios. The adjusted odds ratio was 2.12 (95%CI: 1.91-2.36).

Conclusion

Women with previous cesarean deliveries have a risk of breech presentation at term twice that of women with previous vaginal deliveries.

Key words: breech presentation, cesarean delivery, uterine scar

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Cite this article as: Vendittelli F, Rivière O, Crenn-Hébert C, et al. Is a breech presentation at term more frequent in women with a history of cesarean delivery? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;198:521.e1-521.e6.

PII: S0002-9378(07)02116-3

doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2007.11.009

American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 198, Issue 5 , Pages 521.e1-521.e6, May 2008