American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 198, Issue 3 , Pages 248-253, March 2008

Contraceptive efficacy of intrauterine devices

  • Patrick F. Thonneau, MD, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationReprints: Patrick F. Thonneau, MD, MSc, Equipe d’accueil EA 3694 - Recherche en Fertilité Humaine, Hôpital Paule de Viguier - Service d’Urologie-Andrologie, 330, avenue de Grande Bretagne, TSA 70034 - 31059, Toulouse cedex 9, France
  • ,
  • Thierry E. Almont, MD

Human Fertility Research Group, Toulouse University Hospital, France.

Received 7 July 2007; accepted 1 October 2007. published online 28 January 2008.

To compare the contraceptive efficacy of various types of intrauterine devices (IUD; copper devices, Nova-T, intrauterine contraceptive systems, levonorgestrel-releasing devices), we reviewed all relevant publications on this subject that have been published over the last 2 decades. The first point to be highlighted by this review is the excellent effectiveness of IUDs, with a global cumulative pregnancy rate <2% at 5 years, whatever the type of device used. We observed a large variation in efficacy rate according to the type of IUD and also according to study design. Nevertheless, of all the types of IUDs, the levonorgestrel-releasing IUD and to a lesser extent the TCu380A IUD seem to be the most effective, with a cumulative pregnancy rate at 5 years of <0.5% for the levonorgestrel-releasing IUD and between 0.3% and 0.6% for the TCu380A IUD.

Key words: contraceptive efficacy, intrauterine device (IUD), levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS)

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-9378(07)01984-9

doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2007.10.787

Refers to erratum:

  • Correction

    American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology April 2008 (Vol. 198, Issue 4, Page 485)

American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 198, Issue 3 , Pages 248-253, March 2008