American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 197, Issue 4 , Pages 340-345, October 2007

2006 consensus guidelines for the management of women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or adenocarcinoma in situ

  • Thomas C. Wright Jr, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pathology, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University, New York, NY
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprints: Thomas C. Wright Jr, MD, Department of Pathology, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University, Room 16-404, P&S Building, 630 West 168th St, New York, NY 10032
  • ,
  • L. Stewart Massad, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
  • ,
  • Charles J. Dunton, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lankenau Hospital, Wynnewood, PA
  • ,
  • Mark Spitzer, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brookdale University Hospital and Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY
  • ,
  • Edward J. Wilkinson, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pathology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL
  • ,
  • Diane Solomon, MD

      Affiliations

    • National Institutes of Health and National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.
  • ,
  • 2006 American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology–sponsored Consensus Conference

Received 6 April 2007; received in revised form 28 June 2007; accepted 29 July 2007.

A group of 146 experts representing 29 organizations and professional societies met Sept. 18-19, 2006, in Bethesda, MD, to develop revised evidence-based, consensus guidelines for managing women with abnormal cervical cancer screening tests. The management of low-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 1 has been modified significantly. Previously, management depended on whether colposcopy was satisfactory and treatment using ablative or excisional was acceptable for all women with CIN 1. In the new guidelines, cytological follow-up is the only recommended management option for women with CIN 1 who have low-grade referral cervical cytology, regardless of whether the colposcopic examination is satisfactory. Treatment is particularly discouraged in adolescents. The basic management of women in the general population with CIN 2,3 underwent only minor modifications, but options for the conservative management of adolescents with CIN 2,3 have been expanded. Moreover, management recommendations for women with biopsy-confirmed adenocarcinoma in situ are now included.

Key words: adenocarcinomas in situ of the cervix, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, cryotherapy, loop electrosurgical excision procedure, treatment

 

PII: S0002-9378(07)00933-7

doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2007.07.050

Refers to article:

  • The evolution of cost-effective screening and prevention of cervical carcinoma: implications of the 2006 consensus guidelines and human papillomavirus vaccination

    Bradley J. Monk, Thomas J. Herzog
    American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology October 2007 (Vol. 197, Issue 4, Pages 337-339)

  • 2006 consensus guidelines for the management of women with abnormal cervical cancer screening tests

    Thomas C. Wright, L. Stewart Massad, Charles J. Dunton, Mark Spitzer, Edward J. Wilkinson, Diane Solomon, 2006 American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology–sponsored Consensus Conference
    American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology October 2007 (Vol. 197, Issue 4, Pages 346-355)

American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 197, Issue 4 , Pages 340-345, October 2007