Infant human immunodeficiency virus diagnosis in resource-limited settings: issues, technologies, and country experiences
Received 15 December 2006; received in revised form 16 February 2007; accepted 1 March 2007.
Diagnosing human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in infants is difficult because maternal HIV antibodies cross the placenta, causing positive serologic tests in HIV-exposed infants for the first several months of life. Early definitive diagnosis of HIV requires virologic testing such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR), which is the diagnostic standard in resource-rich settings but has been too complex and expensive for widespread use in most countries with high HIV prevalence. Early PCR testing can help HIV-infected infants access treatment, provide psychosocial benefits for families of uninfected infants, and help programs for prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV monitor their effectiveness. HIV testing, including PCR, is increasingly available for infants in resource-limited settings, but there are many barriers and complex policy decisions that need to be addressed before universal early testing can become standard. This paper reviews challenges and progress in the field and suggests ways to facilitate early infant testing in resource-limited settings.
1Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/National Center for HIV, Hepatitis, STD, TB Prevention/Global AIDS Program, Atlanta, GA
2University of the Witwatersrand and National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa
3Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/National Center for HIV, Hepatitis, STD, TB Prevention/Global AIDS Program, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
4Makerere University–Johns Hopkins University Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda.
Reprints: Dr. Tracy L Creek, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/National Center for HIV, Hepatitis, STD, TB Prevention/ Global AIDS Program/Prevention of Mother-to-Child Transmission Team, 1600 Clifton Rd, MS E-04, Atlanta, GA 30333.
The findings and views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.