« Previous
Next »
American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 196, Issue 5
, Pages 465.e1-465.e4
, May 2007
Usage of spot urine protein to creatinine ratios in the evaluation of preeclampsia
References
- . Use of single voided urine sample to estimate quantitative proteinuria. N Engl J Med. 1982;309:1543–1546
- . A prospective study of the impact of automated dipstick urinalysis on the diagnosis of preeclampsia. Hypertens Pregnancy. 2004;23:135–142
- . Urinary dipstick protein: a poor predictor of absent or severe proteinuria. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;170:137–141
- . Urine protein-to-creatinine ratio is a reliable measure of proteinuria in lupus nephritis. J Rheumatol. 2004;31:1557–1559
- Cost-benefit analysis and prediction of 24-hour proteinuria from the spot urine protein-creatinine ratio. Clin Nephrol. 2001;55:436–447
- . Protein-to-creatinine ratio in spot urine samples as a predictor of quantification of proteinuria. Clinica Chimica Acta. 2004;350:35–39
- . The urine protein to creatinine ration (P/C) as a predictor of 24-hour urine protein excretion in renal transplant patients. Transplantation. 2001;72:1453–1456
- . Correlation between 24-hour urinary protein excretion and protein/creatinine ratio in the first voided morning urine samples. Jpn J Nephrol. 2004;46:26–34
- . Correlation between random urinary protein-to creatinine ratio and quantitation of 24-hour proteinuria in preeclampsia. J Med Assoc Thai. 2003;86:69–73
- . Predicition of 24-hour protein excretion in pregnancy with a single voided urine protein-to-creatinine ratio. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186:883–886
- . Use of random urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio for the diagnosis of significant proteinuria during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185:808–811
- . Urinary protein/creatinine ratio in hypertensive pregnant women. Hypertens Pregnancy. 1999;18:209–218
- . Random protein-creatinine ratio for the quantization of proteinuria in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;90:893–895
- . Improved methods of assessing proteinuria in hypertensive pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;104:1159–1164
- . Use of the protein/creatinine ratio of a single voided urine specimen in the evaluation of suspected pregnancy-induced hypertension. J Fam Pract. 1996;42:385–389
- . Assessment of renal function during pregnancy using a random urine protein to creatinine ratio and Cockcroft-Gault formula. Am J Kidney Dis. 1994;24:416–420
- . Protein/creatinine ratio in random urine specimens for quantization of proteinuria in preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol. 1990;75:604–606
- . Random urine protein-creatinine ratio to predict proteinuria in new-onset mild hypertension in late pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104:367–371
- . A prospective comparison of total protein/creatinine ratio versus 24-hour urine protein in women with suspected preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189:848–852
- . Urinary protein/creatinine ratio before and during pregnancy in women with diabetes mellitus. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;165:920–923
- . Comparing ambulatory spot urine protein/creatinine ratios and 24-h urine protein measurements in normal pregnancies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2003;14:233–236
- . Use of protein:creatinine ratio measurements on random urine samples for prediction of significant proteinuria: a systematic review. Clin Chem. 2005;9:1577–1586
- . ACOG practice bulletin (Diagnosis and management of preeclampsia and eclampsia). Number 33, January 2002 Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2002;77:67–75
- . In: TP slide: microslide instructions for use manual and Vitros chemistry products (Version 5). Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics Inc; 2004;p. 1–10
- . In: CREA slide: microslide instructions for use manual and Vitros chemistry products (Version 5). Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics Inc; 2004;p. 1–12
- . Proteinuria in pre-eclampsia: how much matters?. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;112:280–285
Cite this article as: Wheeler TL, Blackhurst DW, Dellinger EH, et al. Usage of spot urine protein to creatinine ratios in the evaluation of preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;196;465.e1-465.e4.
PII: S0002-9378(06)02207-1
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.10.892
© 2007 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 196, Issue 5
, Pages 465.e1-465.e4
, May 2007
