« Previous
Next »
American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 196, Issue 1
, Pages 29.e1-29.e6
, January 2007
Beyond access: Acceptability, use and nonuse of emergency contraception among young women
References
- Alan Guttmacher Institute. State policies in brief: emergency contraception, as of December 1, 2006. Available at: http://www.guttmacher.org/statecenter/spibs/spib_EC.pdf. Accessed December 1, 2006.
- Kaiser Family Foundation. SELF Magazine. National survey of women about their sexual health. Available at: http://www.kff.org/womenshealth/3341-index.cfm. Accessed September 21, 2005.
- . Emergency contraception in California: findings from a 2003 Kaiser Family Foundation survey. 2004;February
- . Direct access to emergency contraception through pharmacies and effect on unintended pregnancy and STIs: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2005;293:54–62
- . Advance supply of emergency contraception: effect on use and usual contraception—a randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102:8–16
- . Emergency contraception: randomized comparison of advance provision and information only. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;98:570–575
- . Emergency contraception: advance provision in a young, high-risk clinic population. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;96:1–7
- . The effects of self-administering emergency contraception. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:1–4
- . Unintended pregnancy in the United States. Fam Plan Perspect. 1998;30:24–2946
- . Abortion incidence and services in the United States in 2000. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2003;35:6–15
- . Contraceptive use among U.S. women having abortions in 2000-2001. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2002;34:294–303
- . The effects of advance provision of emergency contraception on adolescent women’s sexual and contraceptive behaviors. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2004;17:87–96
- . Emergency contraception: who are the users?. Int J STD AIDS. 2004;15:309–313
- . Differences between users and non-users of emergency contraception after a recognized unprotected intercourse. Contraception. 2000;62:1–3
- . Emergency contraception: knowledge and use among Danish women requesting termination of pregnancy. Contraception. 2002;66:427–431
- . The remaining barriers to the use of emergency contraception: perception of pregnancy risk by women undergoing induced abortions. Contraception. 2005;71:202–207
- . Emergency contraception: why can’t you give it away? (Qualitative findings from an evaluation of advance provision of emergency contraception). Contraception. 2004;70:25–29
- . Young women’s accounts of factors influencing their use and non-use of emergency contraception: in-depth interview study. BMJ. 2002;325:1393–1396
- . Supplying emergency contraception via community pharmacies in the UK: reflections on the experiences of users and providers. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57:2367–2378
- . Women’s experience and satisfaction with emergency contraception. Fam Plan Perspect. 1999;31:237–240260
- . A randomized trial of mifepristone (10 mg) and levonorgestrel for emergency contraception. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104:1307–1313
- . The impact of patient experience on practice: the acceptability of emergency contraceptive pills in inner-city clinics. JAMA. 1998;53:255–258
- . Tolerability of levonorgestrel emergency contraception in adolescents. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:1158–1163
- . Low dose mifepristone and two regimens of levonorgestrel for emergency contraception: a WHO multicentre randomized trial. Lancet. 2002;360:1803–1810
- . Levonorgestrel-only emergency contraception: real-world tolerance and efficacy. Contraception. 2001;64:17–21
- . Randomized controlled trial of levonorgestrel versus the Yuzpe regimen of combined oral contraceptives for emergency contraception. Lancet. 1998;352:428–433
- . Increased access to emergency contraception among young adolescents in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106:483–491
- . Advanced provision of emergency contraception does not reduce abortion rates. Contraception. 2004;69:361–366
- . Provision of emergency contraceptive pills to spermicide users in Ghana. Contraception. 2000;61:287–293
- . Impact on contraceptive practice of making emergency hormonal contraception available over the counter in Great Britain: repeated cross sectional surveys. BMJ. 2005;331:271;EPub: July 2005
- . Effects of making emergency contraception available without a physician’s prescription: a population-based study. Can Med Assoc J. 2005;172:878–883
- . A national study examining the effect of making emergency hormonal contraception available without prescription. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:553–557
- . How can pharmacies improve access to emergency contraception?. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2002;34:162–165
Sources of financial support: William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, Compton Foundation, Inc, Open Society Institute, Wallace Alexander Gerbode Foundation, Women’s Capital Corporation, former distributor of Plan B, donated the emergency contraceptive pills.Cite this article as Rocca CH, Schwarz EB, Stewart FH, et al. Beyond access: Acceptability, use, and nonuse of emergency contraception among young women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;196:29.e1-29.e6
PII: S0002-9378(06)01162-8
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.08.024
© 2007 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 196, Issue 1
, Pages 29.e1-29.e6
, January 2007
