American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 195, Issue 4 , Pages 1138-1142, October 2006

Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in twin gestations: A large, nationwide sample of deliveries

  • Abigail A.D. Ford, MD

      Affiliations

    • College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University
  • ,
  • Brian T. Bateman, MD

      Affiliations

    • College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University
  • ,
  • Lynn L. Simpson, MD

      Affiliations

    • Maternal-Fetal Medicine Division, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Lynn L. Simpson, MD, Columbia University Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 622 West 168th Street, PH 16-66, New York, NY 10032.

Received 19 February 2006; received in revised form 6 June 2006; accepted 9 June 2006.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to assess the maternal morbidity associated with attempted vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) in twin gestations using a large, nationwide sample of deliveries.

Study design

Data for this study were obtained from an administrative dataset, the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, a representative sample of discharges from non-Federal hospitals, for the years 1993 to 2002. Patients admitted nonemergently for the delivery of twin gestations who had a history of previous cesarean delivery were selected. Patients that either delivered vaginally or who had discharge codes that indicated labor before cesarean delivery were defined as the trial of labor group, while patients who had a cesarean delivery without discharge codes that indicated labor were defined as the elective cesarean group. Various complications of delivery were analyzed for each group.

Results

We identified 4705 women who underwent an elective cesarean delivery and 1850 women who underwent a trial of labor. For women who had a trial of labor, 836 (45.2%) delivered vaginally. The rate of uterine rupture was higher in the trial of labor group than in the elective cesarean group (0.9% vs 0.1%, P < .001), and the rate of wound complications was lower (0.6% vs 1.3%, P < .02). The rates of other complications including hysterectomy, transfusion, major postpartum infection, thromboembolism, uterine dehiscence, and pelvic hematoma were not significantly different between the 2 groups.

Conclusion

Our study showed a significantly higher rate of uterine rupture in the trial of labor group that is similar to the rates reported for trial of labor after cesarean in singleton pregnancies.

Key words: VBAC, Twin gestation, Uterine rupture

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Presented at the Twenty-Sixth Annual Meeting of the Society for Maternal Fetal Medicine, Miami, FL, January 30-February 4, 2006.

PII: S0002-9378(06)00760-5

doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2006.06.036

American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 195, Issue 4 , Pages 1138-1142, October 2006