American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 194, Issue 5 , Pages 1418-1422, May 2006

Mesh erosion in abdominal sacral colpopexy with and without concomitant hysterectomy

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC

Received 24 June 2005; received in revised form 7 November 2005; accepted 13 January 2006.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to examine risk factors for mesh erosion, including concomitant hysterectomy, in abdominal sacral colpopexies.

Study design

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 313 women who underwent an abdominal sacral colpopexy. Data regarding patient demographics, operative techniques, length of follow-up, postoperative complications, and mesh erosion were collected.

Results

Of 313 subjects, 101 (32.3%) had concomitant hysterectomies and 212 (67.7%) had had previous hysterectomies. The overall rate of mesh erosion was 5.4%. In bivariate analysis, concomitant hysterectomy was not associated with erosion (6.9% vs 4.7% previous hysterectomy, P = .42); however, estrogen therapy was an effect modifier. In women on estrogen, hysterectomy (OR 4.9, CI 1.2-19.7) and anterior imbrication (OR 5.6, CI 1.1-28.6) were associated with mesh erosion. No risk factors were identified in women not on estrogen.

Conclusion

In women on estrogen therapy, hysterectomy was associated with mesh erosion in abdominal sacral colpopexy.

Key words: Abdominal sacral colpopexy, Mesh erosion, Pelvic organ prolapse

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Presented at the Twenty-Sixth Annual Meeting of the American Urogynecologic Society, Atlanta, GA, September 15-17, 2005.Reprints not available from the authors.

PII: S0002-9378(06)00093-7

doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2006.01.051

American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 194, Issue 5 , Pages 1418-1422, May 2006