American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 194, Issue 3 , Pages 809-814 , March 2006

Epidural analgesia associated with low-dose oxytocin augmentation increases cesarean births: A critical look at the external validity of randomized trials

  • Andrew J. Kotaska, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
    • ,
  • Michael C. Klein, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
    • ,
  • Robert M. Liston, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Received 9 June 2005 ,Revised 5 August 2005 ,Accepted 29 September 2005.

References 

  1. Rothwell PM. External validity of randomised controlled trials: “to whom do the results of this trial apply?”. Lancet. 2005;365:82–93
  2. Tonelli MR. The philosophical limits of evidence-based medicine. Acad Med. 1998;73:1234–1240
  3. Bofill JA, Vincent RD, Martin RW, Norman PF, Werhan CF, Morrison JC. Nulliparous active labor, epidural analgesia, and cesarean delivery for dystocia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;177:1465–1470
  4. Clark A, Carr D, Loyd G, Cook V, Spinnato J. The influence of epidural analgesia on cesarean delivery rates: a randomized, prospective clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;179:1527–1533
  5. Loughnan BA, Carli F, Romney M, Dore CJ, Gordon H. Randomized controlled comparison of epidural bupivicaine versus pethidine for analgesia in labour. Br J Anaesth. 2000;84:715–719
  6. Ramin SM, Gambling DR, Lucas MJ, Sharma SK, Sidawi JE, Leveno KJ. Randomized trial of epidural versus intravenous analgesia during labour. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;86:783–789
  7. Sharma SK, Sidawi JE, Ramin SM, Lucas MJ, Leveno KJ, Cunningham G. A randomized trial of epidural versus patient-controlled meperidine analgesia during labor. Anesthesiology. 1997;87:487–494
  8. Sharma SK, Alexander JM, Messick G, Bloom SL, McIntire DD, Wiley J, et al. A randomized trial of epidural analgesia versus intravenous meperidine analgesia during labor in nulliparous women. Anesthesiology. 2002;96:546–551
  9. Howell CJ, Kidd C, Roberts W, Upton P, Lucking L, Jones PW, et al. A randomised controlled trial of epidural compared with non-epidural analgesia in labour. BJOG. 2001;108:27–33
  10. Howell CJ. Epidural versus non-epidural analgesia for pain relief in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;2:CD000331
  11. Lieberman E, O'Donoghue C. Unintended effects of epidural analgesia during labor: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(Suppl Nature):S31–S68
  12. Leighton BL, Halparin SH. The effects of epidural analgesia on labor, maternal, and neonatal outcomes: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(Suppl Nature):S69–S77
  13. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Obstetric Practice . Pain relief during labor. Washington (DC): The College; 2000;ACOG committee opinion no. 231
  14. Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. Dystocia. Ottawa, Canada: SOGC; 1995. SOGC Policy statement no. 40.
  15. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Dystocia and augmentation of labor. Washington (DC): The College; 2003;ACOG practice bulletin no. 49
  16. Thorp JA, Hu DH, Albin RM, Mcnitt J, Meyer BA, Cohen GR, et al. The effect of intrapartum analgesia on nulliparous labor: a randomized, controlled, prospective trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;169:851–858
  17. Sharma SK, Leveno KJ. Update: epidural analgesia during labor does not increase cesarean births. Curr Anesthesiol Reports. 2000;2:18–24
  18. Thacker SB, Stroup DF. Methods and interpretation in systematic reviews: commentary on two parallel reviews of epidural analgesia during labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(Suppl Nature):S78–S80
  19. Bohra U, Donnelly J, O'Connell MP, Geary MP, MacQuillan K, Keane DP. Active management of labour revisited: the first 1000 primiparous labours in 2000. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2003;23:118–120
  20. Frigolletti F, Lieberman E, Lang J, Cohen A, Barss V, Ringer S, et al. A clinical trial of active management of labor. N Eng J Med. 1995;333:745–750
  21. Lopez-Zeno J, Peaceman A, Adashek J, Socol M. A controlled trial of a program for the active management of labor. N Engl J Med. 1992;326:450–454
  22. Akoury H, Brodie G, Caddick R, McLaughin V, Pugh P. Active management of labor and operative delivery in nulliparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988;158:255–258
  23. Xenakis EMJ, Langer O, Piper JM, Conway D, Berkus MD. Low-dose versus high-dose oxytocin augmentation of labor: a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;173:1874–1878
  24. Merril D, Zlatnik F. Randomized, double-masked comparison of oxytocin dosage in induction and augmentation of labor. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;94:455–463
  25. Satin A, Leveno K, Sherman M, Brewster D, Cunningham F. High- versus low-dose oxytocin for labor stimulation. Obstet Gynecol. 1992;80:111–116

 Reprints not available from the authors. Address correspondence to Andrew J. Kotaska, University of British Columbia, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 2H30, B.C. Women's Hospital, 4490 Oak Street, Vancouver, B.C. V6H3V5, Canada

PII: S0002-9378(05)01504-8

doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.09.014

American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 194, Issue 3 , Pages 809-814 , March 2006

Article Tools