American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 195, Issue 3 , Pages 657-672, September 2006

Shoulder dystocia: The unpreventable obstetric emergency with empiric management guidelines

  • Robert B. Gherman, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Maternal/Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Prince George's Hospital Center Cheverly, MD
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Dr Gherman, Division of Maternal/Fetal Medicine, Prince George's Hospital Center, Cheverly, MD.
  • ,
  • Suneet Chauhan, MD

      Affiliations

    • Maternal/Fetal Medicine, Aurora Women's Pavilion, West Allis, WI
  • ,
  • Joseph G. Ouzounian, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Maternal/Fetal Medicine, Kaiser Permanente Baldwin Park, CA
  • ,
  • Henry Lerner, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's at Newton-Wellesley Hospital, Newton, MA
  • ,
  • Bernard Gonik, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI
  • ,
  • T. Murphy Goodwin, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Maternal/Fetal Medicine, University of Southern California School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA

Received 10 February 2005; received in revised form 25 August 2005; accepted 14 September 2005. published online 24 April 2006.

Objective

Much of our understanding and knowledge of shoulder dystocia has been blurred by inconsistent and scientific studies that are of limited scientific quality. In an evidence-based format, we sought to answer the following questions: (1) Is shoulder dystocia predictable? (2) Can shoulder dsytocia be prevented? (3) When shoulder dystocia does occur, what maneuvers should be performed? and (4) What are the sequelae of shoulder dystocia?

Study design

Electronic databases, including PUBMED and the Cochrane Database, were searched using the key word “shoulder dystocia.” We also performed a manual review of articles included in the bibliographies of these selected articles to further define articles for review. Only those articles published in the English language were eligible for inclusion.

Results

There is a significantly increased risk of shoulder dystocia as birth weight linearly increases. From a prospective point of view, however, prepregnancy and antepartum risk factors have exceedingly poor predictive value for the prediction of shoulder dystocia. Late pregnancy ultrasound likewise displays low sensitivity, decreasing accuracy with increasing birth weight, and an overall tendency to overestimate the birth weight. Induction of labor for suspected fetal macrosomia has not been shown to alter the incidence of shoulder dystocia among nondiabetic patients. The concept of prophylactic cesarean delivery as a means to prevent shoulder dystocia and therefore avoid brachial plexus injury has not been supported by either clinical or theoretic data. Although many maneuvers have been described for the successful alleviation of shoulder dystocia, there have been no randomized controlled trials or laboratory experiments that have directly compared these techniques. Despite the introduction of ancillary obstetric maneuvers, such as McRoberts maneuver and a generalized trend towards the avoidance of fundal pressure, it has been shown that the rate of shoulder-dystocia associated brachial plexus palsy has not decreased. The simple occurrence of a shoulder dystocia event before any iatrogenic intervention may be associated with brachial plexus injury.

Conclusion

For many years, long-standing opinions based solely on empiric reasoning have dictated our understanding of the detailed aspects of shoulder dystocia prevention and management. Despite its infrequent occurrence, all healthcare providers attending pregnancies must be prepared to handle vaginal deliveries complicated by shoulder dystocia.

Key words: Shoulder dystocia, Brachial plexus palsy, Risk factors, Management

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-9378(05)01463-8

doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2005.09.007

American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 195, Issue 3 , Pages 657-672, September 2006