« Previous
Next »
American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 193, Issue 1
, Pages 135-140
, July 2005
The Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit cesarean registry: Trial of labor with a twin gestation
References
- . Births: final data for 2000. NVSS. 2002;50:1–102
- Births: preliminary data for 2002. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2003;51:1–20
- . The MFMU cesarean registry: trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery: maternal and perinatal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189:S149
- . Vaginal birth after cesarean section in twin gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175:194–198
- . Twin delivery after a previous caesarean: a twelve-year experience. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2003;25:294–298
- . Trial of labour compared to elective caesarean in twin gestations with a previous caesarean delivery. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2003;25:289–292
- . Vaginal birth of twins after a previous cesarean section. J Matern Fetal Med. 2001;10:171–174
- . Evidence that women with a history of cesarean section can deliver twins safely. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1997;76:663–666
- . Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in the twin gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;161:29–32
- . Twin vaginal birth after cesarean. Conn Med. 2000;64:205–208
- . Twin delivery after cesarean section: is a trial of labor warranted?. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 1999;28:820–824
- . Vaginal delivery of twins after previous cesarean section. N Engl J Med. 1988;319:118–119
- . Vaginal delivery after previous cesarean section: a survey of 800 cases at the Rotunda Hospital, Dublin. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp. 1965;72:557–563
Supported by grants from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development: HD21410, HD 21414, HD27860, HD27861, HD, 27869, HD 27883, HD 27889, HD, 27905, HD, 27915, HD 27917, HD 34116, HD34122, HD34136, HD34208, HD34210, HD34136, HD40500, HD 40485, HD40544, HD40545, HD40560, HD40512, HD19897 and HD36801.Presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Gynecologic Investigation, Houston, Texas, March 24-27, 2004.
PII: S0002-9378(05)00413-8
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.03.023
© 2005 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 193, Issue 1
, Pages 135-140
, July 2005
