Volume 192, Issue 4 , Pages 1262-1271, April 2005
Correlation of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and aromatase expression in human endometrial cancer: Tissue microarray analysis
Objective
The objective of this study was to compare the prevalence of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), aromatase, and hormone receptor immunohistochemical (IHC) expression to well defined clinical-pathologic prognostic factors in a large group of surgically staged endometrial cancer patients.
Study design
A tissue microarray (TMA) was constructed from 336 separate specimens of endometrial cancer. IHC was perfomed for estrogen (ER) and progesterone (PR) receptor, COX-2, COX-1, and aromatase.
Results
The majority of tumors expressed COX-2 (59%) and aromatase (65%). COX-2 staining significantly correlated with aromatase expression (P < .014) but did not correlate with ER and PR. COX-2 expression was correlated with worsening histologic grade (P < .026) and approached statistical significance for deep myometrial invasion (P < .055). After applying multivariate analysis, no single IHC or combination of IHCs correlated with intrauterine poor prognostic factors or advanced stage. Only myometrial invasion >50% (OR 6.98, P < .001) and nonendometrioid histology (OR 4.933, P < .001) were predictive of advanced stage after multivariate analysis.
Conclusion
COX-2 and aromatase are expressed in the majority of endometrial cancer patients. COX-2 expression was not associated with the great majority of surgical-pathologic prognostic factors. COX-2 expression did significantly correlate with aromatase expression, suggesting that intratumoral production of estrogen in endometrial cancer may be an important mechanism in tumorigenesis.
Key words: Cyclooxygenase-2, Endometrial carcinoma, Aromatase, Tissue microarray
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Presented at the 23rd Annual Meeting of the American Gynecological and Obstetrical Society, September 9-11, 2004, Bolton Landing, NY.
PII: S0002-9378(05)00072-4
doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2005.01.009
© 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 192, Issue 4 , Pages 1262-1271, April 2005
