American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 193, Issue 2 , Pages 387-394, August 2005

Ultrasound evaluation of abnormal umbilical cord coiling in second trimester of gestation in association with adverse pregnancy outcome

  • Mladen Predanic, MD, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Mladen Predanic, MD, MSc, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, 525 East 68th St, Suite M-704, New York, NY 10021.
  • ,
  • Sriram C. Perni, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine
  • ,
  • Stephen T. Chasen, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine
  • ,
  • Rebecca N. Baergen, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY
  • ,
  • Frank A. Chervenak, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine

Received 21 October 2004; received in revised form 10 December 2004; accepted 28 December 2004.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the antenatal umbilical cord coiling index obtained during the fetal anatomic survey in the second trimester as a predictor of adverse pregnancy outcome.

Study design

Four hundred twenty-five consecutive women who had a fetal anatomic survey between 18 to 23 weeks of gestation were evaluated for umbilical cord coiling. The antenatal umbilical cord coiling index was calculated as a reciprocal value of the distance between a pair of coils (antenatal umbilical cord coiling index=1/distance in cm) and was correlated with the following adverse pregnancy outcomes: (1) small for gestational age, (2) mode of delivery, (3) presence of meconium-stained amniotic fluid, (4) presence of nonreassuring fetal status in labor, and (5) Apgar scores at 1 and 5 minutes.

Results

A total of 294 patients had adequate ultrasound images and all antenatal and labor data to meet the study inclusion criteria. Abnormal coiling was associated significantly with small for gestational age neonates at birth (P=.043) and nonreassuring fetal status in labor (P=.007). Nine of 58 neonates (15.5%) with abnormal umbilical coiling were small for gestational age infants compared with 15 of 236 small for gestational age neonates (6.4%) who had normal cord coiling. A nonreassuring fetal status in labor was observed in 25.7% of fetuses (15/58 fetuses) with abnormal umbilical coiling compared with 11.0% of fetuses (26/236 fetuses) with normal cord coiling. In contrast, no statistical difference for Apgar scores at 1 and 5 minutes or higher prevalence of interventional deliveries and meconium-stained amniotic fluid in labor between the groups with normal and abnormal umbilical cord coiling was observed.

Conclusion

Abnormal umbilical cord coiling that is detected at the fetal ultrasound anatomic survey in the second trimester is associated with a higher prevalence of small for gestational age neonates and nonreassuring fetal status in labor. This observation can be used potentially as a predictor of adverse antenatal or perinatal events in future studies.

Key words: Umbilical cord, Umbilical coiling, Coiling index, Ultrasound examination, Adverse pregnancy outcome

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-9378(05)00068-2

doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2004.12.092

American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 193, Issue 2 , Pages 387-394, August 2005