American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 191, Issue 3 , Pages 949-953, September 2004

Diurnal glycemic profile in obese and normal weight nondiabetic pregnant women

  • Yariv Yogev, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center, University Hospital of Columbia University, New York, NY
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Y. Yogev, MD, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center, 1000 Tenth Ave, Suite 11A, New York, NY 10019.
  • ,
  • Avi Ben-Haroush, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tiqva, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
  • ,
  • Rony Chen, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tiqva, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
  • ,
  • Barak Rosenn, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center, University Hospital of Columbia University, New York, NY
  • ,
  • Moshe Hod, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tiqva, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
  • ,
  • Oded Langer, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center, University Hospital of Columbia University, New York, NY

Objective

A paucity of data exists concerning the normal glycemic profile in nondiabetic pregnancies. Using a novel approach that provides continuous measurement of blood glucose, we sought to evaluate the ambulatory daily glycemic profile in the second half of pregnancy in nondiabetic women.

Study design

Fifty-seven obese and normal weight nondiabetic subjects were evaluated for 72 consecutive hours with continuous glucose monitoring by measurement interstitial glucose levels in subcutaneous tissue every 5 minutes. Subjects were instructed not to modify their lifestyle or to follow any dietary restriction. For each woman, mean and fasting blood glucose values were determined; for each meal during the study period, the first 180 minutes were analyzed.

Results

For the study group, the fasting blood glucose level was 75 ± 12 mg/dL; the mean blood glucose level was 83.7 ± 18 mg/dL; the postprandial peak glucose value level was 110 ± 16 mg/dL, and the time interval that was needed to reach peak postprandial glucose level was 70 ± 13 minutes. A similar postprandial glycemic profile was obtained for breakfast, lunch, and dinner. Obese women were characterized by a significantly higher postprandial glucose peak value, increased 1- and 2-hour postprandial glucose levels, increased time interval for glucose peak, and significantly lower mean blood glucose during the night. No difference was found in fasting and mean blood glucose between obese and nonobese subjects.

Conclusion

Glycemic profile characterization in both obese and normal weight nondiabetic subjects provide a measure for the desired level of glycemic control in pregnancy that is complicated with diabetes mellitus.

Key word: Glycemic profile

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Presented at the Twenty-Fourth Annual Meeting of the Society for Maternal Fetal Medicine, New Orleans, La, February 2-7, 2004.

PII: S0002-9378(04)00659-3

doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2004.06.059

American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 191, Issue 3 , Pages 949-953, September 2004