« Previous
Next »
American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 191, Issue 1
, Pages 150-156
, July 2004
Knowledge of emergency contraception among women aged 18 to 44 in California
References
- . Evaluation of a media campaign to increase knowledge about emergency contraception. Contraception. 2001;63:81–87
- . Abortion incidence and services in the United States in 2000. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2003;35:6–15
-
.
Population division: estimated components of state population change: July 1, 2001, to July 1, 2002.
Washington, DC: US Bureau of the Census; 2002;
Table ST-EST2002-04
- . Unintended pregnancy in the United States. Fam Plann Perspect. 1998;30:24–29 46
- Extending the time limit for starting the Yuzpe regimen of EC to 120 hours. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;101:1068–1071
- . Randomised controlled trial of levonorgestrel versus the Yuzpe regimen of combined oral contraceptives for emergency contraception. Lancet. 2003;352:428–433
-
.
Emergency contraception.
In:
Hatcher R, Trussell J, Stewart F, Cates W, Stewart GK, Guest F, et al. editor. Contraceptive technology. 17th rev ed. New York: Ardent Media, Inc; 1998;p. 281–282
-
.
Are we making progress with emergency contraception? Recent findings on American adults.
J Am Med Women Assoc. 1998;53:242–246
- . Emergency contraception: a review of the programmatic and social science literature. Contraception. 2000;61:145–186
- . Teenagers' knowledge of emergency contraception: questionnaire survey in southeast Scotland. BMJ. 1996;312:1567–1569
- . Emergency contraception: a survey of women's knowledge and attitudes. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996;103:1109–1116
-
.
Women's knowledge and awareness of emergency contraception.
Br J Fam Plann. 1996;22:87–90
- . Male sexual partners and the use of emergency contraception. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189:1093–1099
-
Kaiser Family Foundation. 2001 National survey of women's health care providers on reproductive health. Survey Snapshot June 2003.
-
.
What's in a pill? Clarifying the differences between EC and RU486.
American Sexuality Magazine. 2003;1(7):doc 4;
[serial online]
☆ This research was supported in part by funds from the California Program on Access to Care (CPAC), California Policy Research Center, University of California, grant number 02GT15.The views and opinions expressed do not necessarily represent those of The Regents of the University of California, CPAC, its advisory board, or any state or county executive agency represented thereon.Data were provided by the California Women's Health Survey (CWHS) Group. The CWHS is coordinated by the California Department of Health Services in collaboration with the California Department of Mental Health, the California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs; California Medical Review, Inc; the Department of Social Services; and the Public Health Institute. Funding for the survey was provided by the collaborators and by a grant from the California Wellness Foundation. Analyses, findings and conclusions described in this article are not necessarily endorsed by the CWHS Group.
PII: S0002-9378(04)00022-5
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.01.004
© 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 191, Issue 1
, Pages 150-156
, July 2004
