American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 188, Issue 6 , Pages 1565-1572, June 2003

Risk of cesarean delivery after induction at term in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix

Presented at the Sixty-Ninth Annual Meeting of the Pacific Coast Obstetrical and Gynecological Society, Oct 22-27, 2002, Rancho Mirage, Calif.

Portland, Ore

From Women's Healthcare Associates, LLC,a and the Providence Health System.b

Abstract 

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of induction on the route of delivery in nulliparous women laboring at term in a community hospital system. Study Design: From April 1997 to October 1999, there were 7282 deliveries in nulliparous patients who met inclusion criteria. Cesarean delivery rates were calculated for patients in spontaneous labor and for patients who underwent induction. Results: Among 4635 women (63.7%) in spontaneous labor, the cesarean delivery rate was 11.5% versus 23.7% among the 2647 (36.3%) patients who underwent induction. An important variable that affected the delivery route was the Bishop score at the initiation of the induction. The cesarean delivery rate was 31.5% among patients whose Bishop score was <5 at induction versus 18.1% for patients with a score ≥5 (P < .001). Conclusion: The induction of labor in nulliparous patients, especially those women with an unfavorable cervix as measured by Bishop score, is associated with a significantly increased risk of cesarean delivery. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;188:1565-72.)

Keywords:  Cesarean delivery, induction, Bishop score

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Reprint requests: David P. Johnson, MD, 9555 SW Barnes Road, Suite 100, Portland, OR 97225.

PII: S0002-9378(03)00414-9

doi:10.1067/mob.2003.458

American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 188, Issue 6 , Pages 1565-1572, June 2003