« Previous
Next »
American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 188, Issue 2
, Pages 566-574
, February 2003
Ultrasonographic prediction of term birth weight: How accurate is it?
References
- . Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements: A prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985;151:333–337
- . An evaluation of two equations for predicting fetal weight by ultrasound. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982;142:47–54
- . Comparison of fetal weight estimation formulas with and without head measurements. Obstet Gynecol. 1986;67:569–573
- . Ultrasonic measurement of fetal abdomen circumference in the estimation of fetal weight. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1975;82:689–697
-
.
Computer-assisted analysis for prediction of fetal weight by ultrasound-comparison of biparietal diameter (BPD), abdominal circumference (AC) and femur length (FL).
J Formosan Med Assoc. 1987;86:957–964
- Formulas for fetal weight estimation by ultrasound measurements based on neonatal specific gravities and volumes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987;157:1140–1145
- . Computer-assisted evaluation of ultrasonic fetal weight prediction using multiple regression equations with and without the fetal femur length. J Ultrasound Med. 1985;4:65–67
- . Estimation of fetal weight from ultrasonic measurement of trunk circumference. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1975;82:698–701
- . Estimation of fetal weight by ultrasound. J Clin Ultrasound. 1983;11:59–66
- . Fetal weight estimation formulas with head, abdominal, femur, and thigh circumference measurements. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987;157:410–414
- . Accurate ultrasonic estimation of fetal weight. Am J Perinatol. 1986;3:307–310
- . Sonographic estimation of fetal weight based on a model of fetal volume. Obstet Gynecol. 1993;82:365–370
- . Intrapartum detection of a macrosomic fetus: Clinical versus 8 sonographic models. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995;35:266–270
- . Clinical vs sonographic estimate of birth weight in term parturients: A randomized clinical trial. J Reprod Med. 2000;45:317–322
- . A comparison of clinical and ultrasonic estimation of fetal weight. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;91:212–217
- . Predicting fetal weight: Are Leopold’s maneuvers still worth teaching to medical students and house staff?. J Reprod Med. 2002;47:271–278
- . Prediction of high birth weight from maternal characteristics, symphysis fundal height and ultrasound biometry. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1993;35:27–33
- . Accurate prediction of term birth weight from prospectively measurable maternal characteristics. J Reprod Med. 1999;44:705–712
- . Validation of a birth weight prediction equation based on maternal characteristics. J Reprod Med. 2002;47:752–760
- . Fetal weight gain at term: Linear with minimal dependence on maternal obesity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;172:1387–1394
- . Birth weights of infants of black and white mothers without pregnancy complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;164:1299–1302
- . An adjustable fetal weight standard. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1995;6:168–174
- . Effect of uncomplicated chronic hypertension on the risk of small-for-gestational age birth. Am J Epidemiol. 1997;145:689–695
- . The effect of high altitude and other risk factors on birth weight: Independent or interactive effects?. Am J Public Health. 1997;87:1003–1007
- . Receiver operating characteristic curves of sonographic estimated fetal weight for prediction of macrosomia in prolonged pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1997;9:403–408
- . Users’ guides to the medical literature, III: How to use an article about a diagnostic test B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients?. JAMA. 1994;271:703–707
☆ Presented as the Second Prize Paper Winner for Current Clinical and Basic Investigation at the 50th Annual Clinical Meeting of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Los Angeles, Calif, May 4-8, 2002.
☆☆ Reprint requests: Gerard G. Nahum, MD, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center—3241, Durham, NC 27710. E-mail: Nahum001@mc.Duke.edu
PII: S0002-9378(02)71485-3
doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.155
« Previous
Next »
American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 188, Issue 2
, Pages 566-574
, February 2003
