Volume 186, Issue 5, Supplement , Pages S173-S180, May 2002
Labor pain management in the United States: Understanding patterns and the issue of choice☆☆☆★★★
Abstract
We reviewed a considerable body of literature in an attempt to characterize the patterns of managing pain in US childbirth. In doing so, we noted the relatively restricted range of choice most US women have in this situation and the limited amount of information available about what US women prefer, the reasons for their preferences, and what influences them. What is clear is that the range of choice available is substantially narrower than in many of the advanced industrial democracies of Western Europe. The reasons for this include professional training, economic rewards, staffing constraints, and understandable inclinations to avoid pain. What is not clear is what could be done to increase women's choices. Simply supplying more information, however accurate, will surely be inadequate. Changes in training programs could make a difference, as would shifts in payment. There are, however, deeper cultural forces at work that are less open to direction. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:S173-80.)
Keywords: Labor pain, labor, pain management
To access this article, please choose from the options below
☆ The authors received a Symposium honorarium for research and writing support.
☆☆ Dr. Krol was a Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholar at the time this manuscript was prepared. The statements and opinions expressed in this manuscript are those of the authors and should not be construed as representing those of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation or the Clinical Scholars Program.
★ Dr Krol is now with the Center for Oral Health Policy, School of Dental and Oral Surgery and the Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University, New York.
★★ Reprint requests: Theodore R. Marmor, Yale School of Management, 135 Prospect St, PO Box 208200, New Haven, CT 06520-8200. theodore.marmor@yale.edu
PII: S0002-9378(02)70190-7
© 2002 Published by Elsevier Inc.
Volume 186, Issue 5, Supplement , Pages S173-S180, May 2002
