American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 187, Issue 6 , Pages 1673-1678, December 2002

A history of induced abortion in relation to substance use during subsequent pregnancies carried to term

Sewanee, Tenn, Springfield, Ill; Stratham, NH, and Austin, Tex

From the Department of Psychology, University of the South,a the Elliot Institute,b the Institute for Pregnancy Loss,c and the Department of Psychology, University of Texas.d

Received 24 January 2002; received in revised form 14 May 2002; accepted 14 June 2002.

Abstract 

Objective: Previous research has revealed a general association between induced abortion and substance use. The purpose of this study was to examine the correlation when substance use is measured specifically during a subsequent pregnancy. Study Design: A nationally representative sample of women was surveyed about substance use during pregnancy shortly after giving birth. Women with a previous induced abortion, whose second pregnancy was delivered, were compared separately with women with one previous birth and with women with no previous births. Results: Compared with women who gave birth, women who had had an induced abortion were significantly more likely to use marijuana (odds ratio, 10.29; 95% CI, 3.47-30.56), various illicit drugs (odds ratio, 5.60; 95% CI, 2.39-13.10), and alcohol (odds ratio, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.31-3.76) during their next pregnancy. The results with only first-time mothers were very similar. Conclusion: Psychosocial mechanisms that may explain the findings are discussed. Screening for abortion history may help to identify pregnant women who are at risk for substance use more effectively. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;187:1673-8.)

Keywords:  Induced abortion, substance use, pregnancy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Reprint requests: Priscilla Coleman, PhD, Human Development and Family Studies, 16F Family and Consumer Sciences Bldg, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH 43403. E-mail: pcolema@bgnet.bgsu.edu

PII: S0002-9378(02)00489-1

doi:10.1067/mob.2002.127602

American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 187, Issue 6 , Pages 1673-1678, December 2002