« Previous
Next »
American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 185, Issue 5
, Pages 1028-1031
, November 2001
Role of ultrasound for Down syndrome screening in advanced maternal age
References
-
.
Antenatal diagnosis: amniocentesis.
Clin Pediatr. 1979;18:454–462
- . Efficacy of screening for fetal down syndrome in the United States from 1974 to 1997. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;96:979–985
- Maternal serum screening for Down’s syndrome in early pregnancy. BMJ. 1988;297(6653):883–887
- . Four marker serum screening for Down’s syndrome. Prenat Diagn. 1994;14:707–716
- . Trisomy 21: 91% detection rate using second-trimester ultrasound markers. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000;16:133–141
- Best second trimester sonographic markers for the detection of trisomy 21. J Ultrasound Med. 1999;18:469–473
-
.
The role of ultrasonographic markers for trisomy 21 in women with positive serum biochemistry.
Br J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;105:63–67
- Efficacy of community-based second trimester genetic sonography in detecting the chromosomally abnormal fetus. J Ultrasound Med. 2000;19:689–694
- . Ageadjusted ultrasound risk assessment for fetal Down’s syndrome during the second trimester: description of the method and analysis of 142 cases. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1998;12:8–14
- . Reducing the need for amniocentesis in women 35 years of age or older with serum markers for screening. N Engl J Med. 1994;330:1114–1118
-
.
Amniocentesis.
In: 3rd ed.
Milunsky A editors.
Genetic disorders and the fetus. Baltimore: : Johns Hopkins University Press; 1992;p. 33–57
- . The role of midtrimester targeted fetal organ screening combined with the “triple test” and maternal age in the diagnosis of trisomy 21: a retrospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;178:40–44
- . Can the presumed risk of autosomal trisomy be decreased in fetuses of older women following a normal sonogram?. J Ultrasound Med. 1995;14:297–302
- An economic evaluation of second-trimester genetic ultrasonography for prenatal detection of Down syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;179(5):1214–1219
- . Procedure-related miscarriages and Down syndrome-affected births: implications for prenatal testing based on women’s preferences. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;96:979–985
☆ No reprints are available.
PII: S0002-9378(01)69584-X
doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.117673
© 2001 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 185, Issue 5
, Pages 1028-1031
, November 2001
