American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 185, Issue 5 , Pages 1028-1031, November 2001

Role of ultrasound for Down syndrome screening in advanced maternal age

Presented at the Twenty-first Annual Meeting of the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Reno, Nev, February 5-10, 2001.

Farmington and Hartford, Conn, and Springfield, Mass

From the Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,a and the Division of Human Genetics, Department of Pediatrics,b University of Connecticut Health Center, the Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,c Baystate Medical Center, and the Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,d Hartford Hospital

Abstract 

Objective: To determine the sensitivity and false-positive rate of Down syndrome screening by use of maternal serum screen and the genetic sonogram in women ≥35 years of age. Study Design: We searched our perinatal databases retrospectively from January 1992 to January 2000 for the following criteria: known Down syndrome fetus or newborn, advanced maternal age, and genetic sonogram from 14-24 weeks’ gestation. The a priori maternal age or maternal serum screen risk was modified by likelihood ratios for ultrasound markers. Without markers the risk was reduced by 50%. The cut-off was 1:270. Results: Age and maternal serum screen had a sensitivity of 90.5% and a false-positive rate of 27.1%. Age and ultrasound had a 95.2% sensitivity and 43.5% false-positive rate, whereas the combination of age, maternal serum screen, and ultrasound had a 97.6% sensitivity and a 22.0% false-positive rate. Conclusion: The combination of age, maternal serum screen, and ultrasound improves the sensitivity for Down syndrome detection in the advanced maternal age population. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;185:·1028-31.)

Keywords:  Down syndrome screening, genetic sonogram

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 No reprints are available.

PII: S0002-9378(01)69584-X

doi:10.1067/mob.2001.117673

American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 185, Issue 5 , Pages 1028-1031, November 2001