Volume 202, Issue 5 , Pages 485.e1-485.e9, May 2010
Effect of hormone replacement and selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) on the biomechanics and biochemistry of pelvic support ligaments in the cynomolgus monkey (Macaca fascicularis)
Objective
To evaluate the effect of selective estrogen receptor modulators and ethinyl estradiol on the biomechanical and biochemical properties of the uterosacral and round ligaments in the monkey model of menopause.
Study Design
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study on 11 female macaque monkeys. Ovariectomized monkeys received 12 weeks of placebo, raloxifene, tamoxifen, or ethinyl estradiol. Biomechanical step-strain testing and real-time polymerase chain reaction was performed on the uterosacral and round ligaments.
Results
Tamoxifen and raloxifene uterosacrals expressed differing collagen I /III receptor density ratios, but both selective estrogen receptor modulators showed decreased tensile stiffness compared to ethinyl estradiol and controls.
Conclusion
These findings support a possible effect of selective estrogen receptor modulators on biomechanical and biochemical properties of uterosacrals. This may play a role in pelvic organ prolapse.
Key words: macaca fascicularis, pelvic organ prolapse, round ligament, SERMs, uterosacral ligament
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Cite this article as: Shahryarinejad A, Gardner TR, Cline JM, et al. Effect of hormone replacement and selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) on the biomechanics and biochemistry of pelvic support ligaments in the cynomolgus monkey (Macaca fascicularis). Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;202:485.e1-9.
Reprints not available from the authors.
This study was funded by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists ACOG/Solvay Research Award in Menopause. The parent study was supported in part by Johnson and Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development, LLC.
PII: S0002-9378(10)00104-3
doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2010.01.074
© 2010 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 202, Issue 5 , Pages 485.e1-485.e9, May 2010
