American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 190, Issue 1 , Pages 129-134, January 2004

Risk of cesarean delivery in nulliparous women at greater than 41 weeks' gestational age with an unengaged vertex

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,a Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, and the Division of Research,b Kaiser Permanente, Santa Clara and Oakland, Calif. USA

Received 2 May 2003; received in revised form 25 June 2003; accepted 15 July 2003.

Abstract 

Objective

The purpose of this study was to determine whether an unengaged vertex significantly increased the risk of cesarean delivery in nulliparous patients at 41 weeks or greater.

Study design

The medical records from all nulliparous patients greater than 41 weeks' gestation delivered at a single institution were reviewed. Patients undergoing both spontaneous and induced labor were included. Multivariate analyses were used to compare the influence of admission fetal station versus induction of labor on the risk of cesarean delivery.

Results

Four hundred forty-eight nulliparous women at greater than 41 weeks' gestation were delivered at our institution during the study period. Sixty-two percent of these patients underwent induction of labor. There was a statistically significant increase in cesarean delivery rate compared with station (6% of patients at −1 station, 20% at −2 station, 43% at −3 station, and 77% at −4 station; P=.001). Compared with patients with an engaged vertex, patients with an unengaged vertex had 12.4 times the risk of cesarean delivery. Most of the cesarean deliveries were performed for failure to progress. On the basis of multivariate analysis, the odds of cesarean delivery were better predicted by fetal station than induction of labor.

Conclusion

Nulliparous patients at 41 weeks or greater with an unengaged vertex are 12.4 times more likely to be delivered by cesarean section than a patient with an engaged vertex.

Keywords:  Cesarean delivery, Nulliparity, Engagement

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Presented at the First Annual Meeting of the Kaiser Permanente Medical Center Northern California Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Resident Research Symposium, Oakland, Calif, May 31, 2003.To be published in abstract form in The Permanente Journal Summer Issue (June/July) in a special section for abstracts from the First Annual Resident Research Symposium.

PII: S0002-9378(03)00909-8

doi:10.1016/S0002-9378(03)00909-8

American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 190, Issue 1 , Pages 129-134, January 2004