« Previous
Next »
American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 200, Issue 3
, Pages 340.e1-340.e3
, March 2009
Overestimation of fetal weight by ultrasound: does it influence the likelihood of cesarean delivery for labor arrest?
References
- . Limitations of clinical and sonographic estimates of birth weight: experience with 1034 parturients. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;91:72–77
- . Clinical and sonographic estimation of fetal weight performed during labor by residents. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192:1407–1409
- . Clinical and ultrasound estimation of birth weight prior to induction of labor at term. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;29:304–309
- . A comparison of clinical and ultrasonic estimation of fetal weight. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;91:212–217
- . Reliability of ultrasound estimation of fetal weight in term singleton pregnancies. N Z Med J. 2006;119:U2146
- . A systematic review of the ultrasound estimation of fetal weight. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;25:80–89
- . A review of sonographic estimate of fetal weight: vagaries of accuracy. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2005;18:211–220
- . ACOG Practice Bulletin, clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists (Ultrasonography in pregnancy). Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112:951–961
- . Elective induction versus spontaneous labor after sonographic diagnosis of fetal macrosomia. Obstet Gynecol. 1993;81:492–496
- Suspicion and treatment of the macrosomic fetus: a review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193:332–346
- . Fetal macrosomia (Practice Bulletin no. 22). 2000;Washington, DC
- . Duration of labor induction in nulliparous women at term: how long is long enough?. Am J Perinatol. 2008;25:205–209
- . Sonographic diagnosis of the large for gestational age fetus at term: does it make a difference?. Obstet Gynecol. 1992;79:55–58
- . Suspected macrosomia? (Better not tell). Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2008;278:225–230
Cite this article as: Blackwell SC, Refuerzo J, Chadha R, et al. Overestimation of fetal weight by ultrasound: does it influence the likelihood of cesarean delivery for labor arrest? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;200:340.e1-340.e3.
Reprints not available from the authors.
PII: S0002-9378(08)02449-6
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.12.043
© 2009 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 200, Issue 3
, Pages 340.e1-340.e3
, March 2009
