American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 199, Issue 6, Supplement B , Pages S362-S366 , December 2008

The clinical content of preconception care: care of psychosocial stressors

  • Lorraine V. Klerman, DrPH

      Affiliations

    • Institute for Child, Youth, and Family Policy, The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA
  • ,
  • Brian W. Jack, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Family Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA
  • ,
  • Dean V. Coonrod, MD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and the Center for Healthcare against Family Violence, Maricopa Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ
  • ,
  • Michael C. Lu, MD, MS, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology & Community Health Sciences, University of California-Los Angeles Schools of Medicine and Public Health, Los Angeles, CA
  • ,
  • Yvonne W. Fry-Johnson, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatrics, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
  • ,
  • Kay Johnson, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Johnson Group Consulting, Inc, Hinesburg, VT

Received 17 June 2008 ,Revised 6 August 2008 ,Accepted 20 August 2008.

References 

  1. McEwen BS. Protective and damaging effects of stress mediators. N Eng J Med. 1998;338:171–179
  2. Chrousos GP. Stress response and immune function: clinical implications. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2000;917:38–67
  3. US Census Bureau. Last revised: August 28, 2007 http://pubdb3.census.gov/macro/032007/pov/new01_100_01.htmAccessed February 2, 2008
  4. DeNavas-Walt C, Proctor BD, Smith J. US Census Bureau: current population reports, P60-233, income, poverty, and health insurance coverage in the United States: 2006. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 2007;
  5. Haas JS, Meneses V, McCormick MC. Outcomes and health status of socially disadvantaged women during pregnancy. J Women's Health Gend Based Med. 1999;8:547–553
  6. Huynh M, Parker JD, Harper S, Pamuk E, Schoendorf KC. Contextual effect of income inequality on birth outcomes. Int J Epidemiol. 2005;34:888–895
  7. US Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration. Women's Health USA 2007. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2007;
  8. Salganicoff A, Ranji UR, Wyn R. Women and health care: a national profile, key findings from the Kaiser Women's Health Survey. Washington, DC: Kaiser Family Foundation; 2005;
  9. Kaiser Family Foundation. Health insurance coverage of women ages 18 to 64, by state, 2004-2005. Women's Health Policy Facts, February 2007.
  10. Understanding intimate partner violence: fact sheet. http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc/dvp/ipv_factsheet.pdfAccessed: March 19, 2008
  11. Tjaden P, Thoennes N. Extent, Nature, and Consequences of Intimate Partner Violence. Findings from the National Violence against Women Survey. National Institute of Justice and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, July 2000 (NCJ 181867).
  12. Centers for Disease Control. Adverse health conditions and health risk behaviors associated with intimate partner violence—United States, 2005. MMWR. 2008;57:113–117
  13. Gazmararian JA, Petersen R, Spitz AM, Goodwin MM, Saltzman LE, Marks JS. Violence and reproductive health: current knowledge and future research directions. Matern Child Health J. 2000;4:79–84
  14. Martin SL, Mackie L, Kupper LL, Buescher PA, Moracco KE. Physical abuse of women before, during, and after pregnancy. JAMA. 2001;285:1581–1584
  15. Coker AL. Does physical intimate partner violence affect sexual health?. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse. 2007;8:149–177
  16. Kendall-Tackett KA. Violence against women and the perinatal period. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse. 2007;8:344–353
  17. Sharps PW, Laughon K, Giangrande SK. Intimate partner violence and the childbearing year. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse. 2007;8:105–116
  18. Silverman JG, Decker MR, Reed E, Raj A. Intimate partner violence victimization prior to and during pregnancy among women residing in 26 US States: associations with maternal and neonatal health. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195:140–148
  19. McMahon PM, Goodwin MM, Stringer G. Sexual violence and reproductive health. Matern Child Health J. 2000;4:121–124
  20. US Department of Health and Human Services, Administration on Children, Youth, and Families. Child Maltreatment 2005. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 2007;
  21. Roberts TA, Klein JD, Fisher S. Longitudinal effect of intimate partner abuse on high-risk behavior among adolescents. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003;157:875–881
  22. Phelan MB. Screening for intimate partner violence in medical settings. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse. 2007;8:199–213
  23. Plichta SB. Interactions between victims of intimate partner violence against women and the health care system. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse. 2007;8:226–239
  24. Intimate partner violence during pregnancy. A guide for clinicians. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/violence/IntimatePartnerViolence/index.htm. Accessed September 25, 2008.
  25. MacMillan HL, Wathen CN, Jamieson E, et al. McMaster Violence Against Women Research Group Approaches to screening for intimate partner violence in health care settings: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2006;296:530–536
  26. Waalen J, Goodwin MM, Spitz AM, Petersen R, Saltzman LE. Screening for intimate partner violence by health care providers: barriers and interventions. Am J Prev Med. 2000;19:230–237
  27. Klap R, Tang L, Wells K, Starks SL, Rodriquez M. Screening for domestic violence among adult women in the United States. J Gen Int Med. 2007;22:579–584
  28. McFarlane J, Groff JY, O'Brien JA, Watson K. Secondary prevention of intimate partner violence. Nurs Res. 2006;55:52–61
  29. US Preventive Services Task Force. The Guide to Clinical Preventive Services 2005: recommendations of the US Preventive Services Task Force. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2005;

 Reprints not available from the authors.

 Conflict of Interest: Lorraine V. Klerman, DrPH; Brian W. Jack, MD; Michael C. Lu, MD, MS, MPH; Yvonne W. Fry-Johnson, MD; and Kay Johnson, MPH have no conflict of interest including grants, honoraria, advisory board membership, or share holdings. Dean V. Coonrod, MD, MPH, is a Grant Recipient from the March of Dimes Arizona Chapter to develop an internatal Care Clinic and from the State of Arizona for a hospital-based domestic violence program. He has funding from CMS (#1HOCMS030207 101) working on compliance with the 6 week postpartum visit as a strategy to improve preconception care.

PII: S0002-9378(08)00979-4

doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.08.042

American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 199, Issue 6, Supplement B , Pages S362-S366 , December 2008